Frictions of Industry Praxis: Ethical Engagement and the Limits of Consumer Empathy

Recent decades have witnessed a growing reliance on ethnographic methods in consumer research to bring cross-functional teams “closer” to their consumers and promote empathy. However, involving clients in ethnographic fieldwork presents new challenges for ethnographic consultants whose ethical commitments and disciplinary training may differ from that of client teams. This article considers the challenges of involving clients in fieldwork, particularly when it involves marginalized populations and/or sensitive, even taboo, discussion topics. I explore the “friction of entrenched praxis” (Chesluk and Youngblood 2023) in industry ethnography, focusing on two of its norms: the prevailing discourse of consumer empathy and the involvement of clients in ethnographic fieldwork. Through reference to a project in which I participated as a qualitative market researcher, I raise critical questions for anthropologists working in industry to consider when evaluating the ethical dimensions of client involvement. To this end, I encourage setting non-negotiable boundaries to protect the participants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Anthropology
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22439/jba.v14i1.7339
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frictions of Industry Praxis: Ethical Engagement and the Limits of Consumer Empathy

Robin Valenzuela
Journal of Business Anthropology
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Frictions of Industry Praxis: Ethical Engagement and the Limits of Consumer Empathy

Robin Valenzuela
article en

Abstract

Recent decades have witnessed a growing reliance on ethnographic methods in consumer research to bring cross-functional teams “closer” to their consumers and promote empathy. However, involving clients in ethnographic fieldwork presents new challenges for ethnographic consultants whose ethical commitments and disciplinary training may differ from that of client teams. This article considers the challenges of involving clients in fieldwork, particularly when it involves marginalized populations and/or sensitive, even taboo, discussion topics. I explore the “friction of entrenched praxis” (Chesluk and Youngblood 2023) in industry ethnography, focusing on two of its norms: the prevailing discourse of consumer empathy and the involvement of clients in ethnographic fieldwork. Through reference to a project in which I participated as a qualitative market researcher, I raise critical questions for anthropologists working in industry to consider when evaluating the ethical dimensions of client involvement. To this end, I encourage setting non-negotiable boundaries to protect the participants.

Journal of Business Anthropology
Western Kentucky University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Frictions of Industry Praxis: Ethical Engagement and the Limits of Consumer Empathy — Robin Valenzuela · Journal of Business Anthropology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS