Evaluation means making CQI collaborative (E = MC<sup>2</sup>): Lessons learned from implementing a new continuous quality improvement process at the Einstein-Montefiore CTSA hub

The NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program has placed greater emphasis on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in recent years. Our institution's CTSA-supported Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) implemented a novel CQI process in response. This manuscript shares lessons learned from our implementation, reflecting a paradigm shift from managing an "evaluation program" to creating a process whose central goal is CQI. Our objective is to share these reflections to support other CTSA hubs' efforts to successfully implement CQI programs. Key elements of our implementation included (1) establishing a shared understanding about CQI's purpose; (2) leveraging a centralized management approach while addressing barriers to implementation; and (3) creating structures that foster collaboration. The CQI framework we chose, FACE (Focus, Analyze, Change, Evaluate), enabled us not only to improve the activities of ICTR modules but also, over time, to refine the CQI process itself. Through regular convenings of module leaders, the ICTR has sought to cultivate a culture of CQI as a dynamic, participatory process that supports mutual learning and collective problem-solving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10136
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation means making CQI collaborative (E = MC2): Lessons learned from implementing a new continuous quality improvement process at the Einstein-Montefiore CTSA hub

Claudia Lechuga, Marla J. Keller, Ariel Y. Fishman, Jessica A. Kahn et al.
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Evaluation means making CQI collaborative (E = MC2): Lessons learned from implementing a new continuous quality improvement process at the Einstein-Montefiore CTSA hub

Claudia Lechuga, Marla J. Keller, Ariel Y. Fishman, Jessica A. Kahn, David W. Lounsbury, Mimi Kim
article en

Abstract

The NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program has placed greater emphasis on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in recent years. Our institution's CTSA-supported Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) implemented a novel CQI process in response. This manuscript shares lessons learned from our implementation, reflecting a paradigm shift from managing an "evaluation program" to creating a process whose central goal is CQI. Our objective is to share these reflections to support other CTSA hubs' efforts to successfully implement CQI programs. Key elements of our implementation included (1) establishing a shared understanding about CQI's purpose; (2) leveraging a centralized management approach while addressing barriers to implementation; and (3) creating structures that foster collaboration. The CQI framework we chose, FACE (Focus, Analyze, Change, Evaluate), enabled us not only to improve the activities of ICTR modules but also, over time, to refine the CQI process itself. Through regular convenings of module leaders, the ICTR has sought to cultivate a culture of CQI as a dynamic, participatory process that supports mutual learning and collective problem-solving.

Journal of Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 9(1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US)
Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, University of Cambridge, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.