Germany’s Energy and Climate Policy as an Ecology of Games

This article analyses a key shift in German energy and climate policy. Following the Fukushima disaster in Japan, the German government decided to shut down eight old nuclear reactors in the short term, and to phase-out the remaining reactors within the next seven years. At the same time, its ambitious climate policy goals relied on energy security through a growing share of renewable energies, an expanded energy grid, improved energy efficiency, and technological innovations, as well as the use of natural gas as a so-called “bridging technology.” In this context, this article provides an overview of competing explanations circulating in the political and social science literature for this path-breaking policy shift, and demonstrates how network analysis can be used to offer an alternative explanation—one in which this policy shift was decisively shaped by both the structural context and situational dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and Governance
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.10023
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Germany’s Energy and Climate Policy as an Ecology of Games

Volker Schneider
3 citations
Politics and Governance
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
article

Germany’s Energy and Climate Policy as an Ecology of Games

Volker Schneider
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This article analyses a key shift in German energy and climate policy. Following the Fukushima disaster in Japan, the German government decided to shut down eight old nuclear reactors in the short term, and to phase-out the remaining reactors within the next seven years. At the same time, its ambitious climate policy goals relied on energy security through a growing share of renewable energies, an expanded energy grid, improved energy efficiency, and technological innovations, as well as the use of natural gas as a so-called “bridging technology.” In this context, this article provides an overview of competing explanations circulating in the political and social science literature for this path-breaking policy shift, and demonstrates how network analysis can be used to offer an alternative explanation—one in which this policy shift was decisively shaped by both the structural context and situational dynamics.

Politics and GovernanceVol. 13
University of Konstanz (DE)
National Science Foundation, University of Minnesota
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Germany’s Energy and Climate Policy as an Ecology of Games — Volker Schneider · Politics and Governance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS