Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Using K-wires versus Fragment-specific Plates: A Prospective Interventional Study

Introduction: Orthopaedic practice frequently deals with Distal Radius Fractures (DRFs); however, the treatment strategies for optimal functional outcomes remain uncertain. K-wiring (Kirschner Wire) is a minimally invasive technique preferred for simple fractures, whereas Fragment-Specific Plating (FSP) offers targeted fixation for complex fracture patterns. Aim: To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of DRFs managed with K-wiring versus FSP. Materials and Methods: The present prospective interventional study was performed in the Department of Orthopaedics of a tertiary care hospital at Pune, Maharashtra, India, over 24 months from January 2023 to December 2024. A total of 40 patients were randomly categorised: K-wire group (n=20) and Plate group (n=20). Functional outcome was assessed with the Mayo modified wrist score, while radiological outcomes included radial inclination, radial height, and volar tilt. The patients were followed-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: At three and six months, significantly greater proportion of patients in the Plate group had higher range of motion (p=0.003 and 0.029, respectively), and total scores (p=0.017 and 0.039, respectively). Similarly, at 6 and 12 months, patients in the Plate group had higher grip strength scores (p=0.025 and 0.010, respectively). Moreover, at three and 12 months, patients in the plate group had higher satisfaction (p=0.003) and higher pain scores (p=0.028), respectively. Both the groups had comparable radial inclination at all the intervals (p>0.05) and volar tilt at three months (p=0.116). At three months, the mean radial height was significantly greater in the plate group (p=0.012). Furthermore, at six and 12 months, the plate group demonstrated significantly higher radial height (p=0.003 and <0.001, respectively) and volar tilt (both p<0.001) compared to the K-wire group. However, the K-wire group was associated with significantly reduced operative time and shorter duration of hospital stay (both p<0.001). Conclusion: Both K-wiring and FSP are effective surgical methods for managing DRFs. However, FSP provides significantly better functional and radiological outcomes, and should be preferred, particularly in patients with complex DRFs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2025/80558.21447
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Using K-wires versus Fragment-specific Plates: A Prospective Interventional Study

Vinod Nair, Satyam Jawa
1 links
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Using K-wires versus Fragment-specific Plates: A Prospective Interventional Study

Vinod Nair, Satyam Jawa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic practice frequently deals with Distal Radius Fractures (DRFs); however, the treatment strategies for optimal functional outcomes remain uncertain. K-wiring (Kirschner Wire) is a minimally invasive technique preferred for simple fractures, whereas Fragment-Specific Plating (FSP) offers targeted fixation for complex fracture patterns. Aim: To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of DRFs managed with K-wiring versus FSP. Materials and Methods: The present prospective interventional study was performed in the Department of Orthopaedics of a tertiary care hospital at Pune, Maharashtra, India, over 24 months from January 2023 to December 2024. A total of 40 patients were randomly categorised: K-wire group (n=20) and Plate group (n=20). Functional outcome was assessed with the Mayo modified wrist score, while radiological outcomes included radial inclination, radial height, and volar tilt. The patients were followed-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: At three and six months, significantly greater proportion of patients in the Plate group had higher range of motion (p=0.003 and 0.029, respectively), and total scores (p=0.017 and 0.039, respectively). Similarly, at 6 and 12 months, patients in the Plate group had higher grip strength scores (p=0.025 and 0.010, respectively). Moreover, at three and 12 months, patients in the plate group had higher satisfaction (p=0.003) and higher pain scores (p=0.028), respectively. Both the groups had comparable radial inclination at all the intervals (p>0.05) and volar tilt at three months (p=0.116). At three months, the mean radial height was significantly greater in the plate group (p=0.012). Furthermore, at six and 12 months, the plate group demonstrated significantly higher radial height (p=0.003 and <0.001, respectively) and volar tilt (both p<0.001) compared to the K-wire group. However, the K-wire group was associated with significantly reduced operative time and shorter duration of hospital stay (both p<0.001). Conclusion: Both K-wiring and FSP are effective surgical methods for managing DRFs. However, FSP provides significantly better functional and radiological outcomes, and should be preferred, particularly in patients with complex DRFs.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.