Critical Information Literacy as a Compass: Using Generative AI in Academic Research and Writing

Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence has become a prevalent topic in our everyday lives, including academic research. This paper explores the use of these tools in scientific research and writing, introducing the concept of generative artificial intelligence and its essential characteristics and assessing the potential and limitations of these tools in academic research. To explore their potential, a categorization of their use into six domains based on the works of Khalifa and Albadawy is provided. Two perspectives will be considered when evaluating their limitations: those related to their algorithmic construction and those related to the results they produce. In the final stage of this paper, the authors conclude that the use of these tools in research should be guided by critical information literacy principles. The work proposes a framework for utilizing generative artificial intelligence tools based on the critical information literacy perspective in seven levels proposed by Schneider, comprising Concentration, Instrumental, Taste, Relevance, Credibility, Ethics, and Critique.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Library trends
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968493
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Information Literacy as a Compass: Using Generative AI in Academic Research and Writing

Marco Schneider, Gabriel Cunha Leal de Araujo
1 citations
Library trends
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
article

Critical Information Literacy as a Compass: Using Generative AI in Academic Research and Writing

Marco Schneider, Gabriel Cunha Leal de Araujo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence has become a prevalent topic in our everyday lives, including academic research. This paper explores the use of these tools in scientific research and writing, introducing the concept of generative artificial intelligence and its essential characteristics and assessing the potential and limitations of these tools in academic research. To explore their potential, a categorization of their use into six domains based on the works of Khalifa and Albadawy is provided. Two perspectives will be considered when evaluating their limitations: those related to their algorithmic construction and those related to the results they produce. In the final stage of this paper, the authors conclude that the use of these tools in research should be guided by critical information literacy principles. The work proposes a framework for utilizing generative artificial intelligence tools based on the critical information literacy perspective in seven levels proposed by Schneider, comprising Concentration, Instrumental, Taste, Relevance, Credibility, Ethics, and Critique.

Library trendsVol. 73(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Online Learning and Analytics
1.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Critical Information Literacy as a Compass: Using Generative AI in Academic Research and Writing — Marco Schneider, Gabriel Cunha Leal de Araujo · Library trends (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS