Disciplinary Responses to Generative AI: Implications for Academic Librarians

Abstract: This paper investigates the emerging integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into various academic disciplines and the implications for academic librarians. As GenAI capabilities expand rapidly, higher education faculty are exploring ways to incorporate this technology into teaching and learning. The paper reviews published literature across three disciplines: art, English composition and writing, and mathematics. Common themes emerge around using GenAI for tasks such as brainstorming ideas, providing feedback, translation, and accessibility support. However, the specific applications tend to align with the core values and ways of thinking in each discipline. The paper argues that for academic librarians to effectively support students and faculty, they need to understand these disciplinary contexts. The paper provides an overview of the current disciplinary conversations to inform how academic librarians can adjust their work accordingly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Library trends
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968494
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplinary Responses to Generative AI: Implications for Academic Librarians

Lauren Hays
Library trends
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Disciplinary Responses to Generative AI: Implications for Academic Librarians

Lauren Hays
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This paper investigates the emerging integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into various academic disciplines and the implications for academic librarians. As GenAI capabilities expand rapidly, higher education faculty are exploring ways to incorporate this technology into teaching and learning. The paper reviews published literature across three disciplines: art, English composition and writing, and mathematics. Common themes emerge around using GenAI for tasks such as brainstorming ideas, providing feedback, translation, and accessibility support. However, the specific applications tend to align with the core values and ways of thinking in each discipline. The paper argues that for academic librarians to effectively support students and faculty, they need to understand these disciplinary contexts. The paper provides an overview of the current disciplinary conversations to inform how academic librarians can adjust their work accordingly.

Library trendsVol. 73(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disciplinary Responses to Generative AI: Implications for Academic Librarians — Lauren Hays · Library trends (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS