AI and the Material Conditions of Instruction

Abstract: While there is a growing literature on the subject of using generative artificial intelligence tools in college teaching in general (and for information literacy instruction in particular), one important question remains underexplored: What is the point? This article suggests an approach to addressing that question by way of considering how technochauvinism—an intellectual attitude that combines blind optimism about the ability of technology to address social problems with the erasure of the human conditions that make that technology possible—discursively shapes and is reinforced by the material conditions of instruction. This approach reveals that concerns about how artificial intelligence does and does not serve pedagogical purposes are ultimately systemic in nature and cannot simply be addressed by teaching the technology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Library trends
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2025.a968496
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI and the Material Conditions of Instruction

Laura Bernhardt, Becca Neel
Library trends
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI and the Material Conditions of Instruction

Laura Bernhardt, Becca Neel
article en

Abstract

Abstract: While there is a growing literature on the subject of using generative artificial intelligence tools in college teaching in general (and for information literacy instruction in particular), one important question remains underexplored: What is the point? This article suggests an approach to addressing that question by way of considering how technochauvinism—an intellectual attitude that combines blind optimism about the ability of technology to address social problems with the erasure of the human conditions that make that technology possible—discursively shapes and is reinforced by the material conditions of instruction. This approach reveals that concerns about how artificial intelligence does and does not serve pedagogical purposes are ultimately systemic in nature and cannot simply be addressed by teaching the technology.

Library trendsVol. 73(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI and the Material Conditions of Instruction — Laura Bernhardt, Becca Neel · Library trends (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS