Biomechanical implications of mass loading in a swine model of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

In obesity, excess weight of the chest and abdomen (mass loading) decreases lung volume and can worsen acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). We investigated whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) fully reverses the effects of mass loading on lung volume and respiratory mechanics in an AHRF swine model. Eighteen Yorkshire pigs were studied: six healthy, eight pre- and postinjury, and four postinjury only. We randomly tested three mass loading conditions: without mass loading, with abdominal loading (6 kg weight), and with combined abdominal and chest mass loading (12 kg total weight). We performed a recruitment maneuver in each condition, followed by a decremental PEEP trial, and identified the best-PEEP as that with the greatest respiratory system compliance (<i>C</i><sub>RS</sub>). Airway pressure, esophageal pressure, and thoracic impedance by electrical impedance tomography) were continuously monitored. After lung injury, best-PEEP increased with loading. <i>C</i><sub>RS</sub> at best-PEEP decreased from 20.6 ± 3.4 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O without loading to 17.7 ± 3.0 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O with abdominal loading [mean difference 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-4.2] and to 14.2 ± 2.8 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O with abdominal and chest loading (mean difference 6.3, 95% CI: 5.0-7.7). Any amount of loading decreased end-expiratory lung volume assessed by computed tomography (CT) at best-PEEP and PEEP 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Combined abdominal-chest loading decreased the vertical lung dimension on CT compared with unloaded and abdominal loading at both levels of PEEP. With mass loading, PEEP did not restore values of <i>C</i><sub>RS</sub> and lung aeration to their unloaded values. In AHRF with mass loading, geometrical constraints may limit PEEP efficacy even when optimally titrated.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In a ventilated swine model, we isolated the mechanical effects of mass loading from those of lung injury. Despite optimization, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could not restore baseline pulmonary compliance or lung volumes in either healthy or injured lungs. Partitioned respiratory mechanics and imaging reveal that geometric constraints and load-induced airway closure, demonstrated here for the first time in injured swine, may limit the effectiveness of recruitment maneuvers and optimized PEEP in mass-loaded lungs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00377.2025
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.07

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical implications of mass loading in a swine model of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Timothy Glen Gaulton, Emanuele Rezoagli, Jason H. T. Bates, Marcus Victor et al.
4 citations
Journal of Applied Physiology
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
6.07
article

Biomechanical implications of mass loading in a swine model of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Timothy Glen Gaulton, Emanuele Rezoagli, Jason H. T. Bates, Marcus Victor, Alice Nova, Glasiele Alcala, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Lorenzo Berra, Sarah E. Gerard, Maurizio Cereda, Tilo Winkler, Rehab Naeem Khalid, Rajiv Gupta, Yi Xin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In obesity, excess weight of the chest and abdomen (mass loading) decreases lung volume and can worsen acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). We investigated whether positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) fully reverses the effects of mass loading on lung volume and respiratory mechanics in an AHRF swine model. Eighteen Yorkshire pigs were studied: six healthy, eight pre- and postinjury, and four postinjury only. We randomly tested three mass loading conditions: without mass loading, with abdominal loading (6 kg weight), and with combined abdominal and chest mass loading (12 kg total weight). We performed a recruitment maneuver in each condition, followed by a decremental PEEP trial, and identified the best-PEEP as that with the greatest respiratory system compliance (<i>C</i><sub>RS</sub>). Airway pressure, esophageal pressure, and thoracic impedance by electrical impedance tomography) were continuously monitored. After lung injury, best-PEEP increased with loading. <i>C</i><sub>RS</sub> at best-PEEP decreased from 20.6 ± 3.4 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O without loading to 17.7 ± 3.0 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O with abdominal loading [mean difference 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-4.2] and to 14.2 ± 2.8 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O with abdominal and chest loading (mean difference 6.3, 95% CI: 5.0-7.7). Any amount of loading decreased end-expiratory lung volume assessed by computed tomography (CT) at best-PEEP and PEEP 3 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Combined abdominal-chest loading decreased the vertical lung dimension on CT compared with unloaded and abdominal loading at both levels of PEEP. With mass loading, PEEP did not restore values of <i>C</i><sub>RS</sub> and lung aeration to their unloaded values. In AHRF with mass loading, geometrical constraints may limit PEEP efficacy even when optimally titrated.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> In a ventilated swine model, we isolated the mechanical effects of mass loading from those of lung injury. Despite optimization, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) could not restore baseline pulmonary compliance or lung volumes in either healthy or injured lungs. Partitioned respiratory mechanics and imaging reveal that geometric constraints and load-induced airway closure, demonstrated here for the first time in injured swine, may limit the effectiveness of recruitment maneuvers and optimized PEEP in mass-loaded lungs.

Journal of Applied PhysiologyVol. 139(3)
University of Vermont (US), University of Iowa (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Center for Pain and the Brain (US), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Mass General Brigham (US), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
6.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.