New sources of inaccuracy? A conceptual framework for studying AI hallucinations

In February 2025, Google’s AI Overview fooled itself and its users when it cited an April Fool’s satire about “microscopic bees powering computers” as factual in search results (Kidman, 2025). Google did not intend to mislead, yet the system produced a confident falsehood. Such cases mark a shift from misinformation caused by human mistakes to errors generated by probabilistic AI systems with no understanding of accuracy or intent to deceive. With the working definition of misinformation as any content that contradicts the best available evidence, I argue that such “AI hallucinations” represent a distinct form of misinformation requiring new frameworks of interpretations and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-182
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New sources of inaccuracy? A conceptual framework for studying AI hallucinations

Anqi Shao
4 citations
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
5.72
article

New sources of inaccuracy? A conceptual framework for studying AI hallucinations

Anqi Shao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In February 2025, Google’s AI Overview fooled itself and its users when it cited an April Fool’s satire about “microscopic bees powering computers” as factual in search results (Kidman, 2025). Google did not intend to mislead, yet the system produced a confident falsehood. Such cases mark a shift from misinformation caused by human mistakes to errors generated by probabilistic AI systems with no understanding of accuracy or intent to deceive. With the working definition of misinformation as any content that contradicts the best available evidence, I argue that such “AI hallucinations” represent a distinct form of misinformation requiring new frameworks of interpretations and interventions.

Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Yale University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.