Graphical interface for goodness-of-fit evaluation and clustering of probability distributions in environmental datasets

Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) tests are applied to assess the suitability of probability distributions for environmental data. However, classical methods such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) and Anderson-Darling (AD) often yield inconsistent outcomes in heterogeneous datasets. Previous studies employed clustering or mixture modeling separately, lacking integration with automated estimation and adaptive weighting. This study introduces a unified framework combining GoF evaluation, K-Means++ clustering, and a KS-weighted mixture model to enhance distribution selection. Seventeen univariate probability distributions were tested on chlorophyll concentration data from the Black Sea, with adequacy assessed via KS and AD tests and five information criteria. The framework was implemented via a MATLAB GUI to automate clustering, estimation, model selection, and evaluation steps. Tested across multiple sample sizes and extended to variables, the GUI demonstrated adaptability and robustness. Model performance showed that the KS-weighted mixture model provided stable fits for complex datasets, improving interpretability and reducing reliance on single-distribution assumptions. <i>This study supports SDG 14 by enhancing tools for monitoring marine ecosystem health through robust modeling of chlorophyll concentration, a key proxy for marine environmental status.</i> Integrates GoF testing, clustering, and mixture modeling Implements a reproducible workflow via MATLAB GUI Enhances robustness and positions mixture modeling within environmental data analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MethodsX
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103586
Primary Topic
Data Management and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graphical interface for goodness-of-fit evaluation and clustering of probability distributions in environmental datasets

Toha Saifudin, Rimuljo Hendradi, Felix Reba
1 links
MethodsX
Data Management and Algorithms
article

Graphical interface for goodness-of-fit evaluation and clustering of probability distributions in environmental datasets

Toha Saifudin, Rimuljo Hendradi, Felix Reba
article en

Abstract

Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) tests are applied to assess the suitability of probability distributions for environmental data. However, classical methods such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) and Anderson-Darling (AD) often yield inconsistent outcomes in heterogeneous datasets. Previous studies employed clustering or mixture modeling separately, lacking integration with automated estimation and adaptive weighting. This study introduces a unified framework combining GoF evaluation, K-Means++ clustering, and a KS-weighted mixture model to enhance distribution selection. Seventeen univariate probability distributions were tested on chlorophyll concentration data from the Black Sea, with adequacy assessed via KS and AD tests and five information criteria. The framework was implemented via a MATLAB GUI to automate clustering, estimation, model selection, and evaluation steps. Tested across multiple sample sizes and extended to variables, the GUI demonstrated adaptability and robustness. Model performance showed that the KS-weighted mixture model provided stable fits for complex datasets, improving interpretability and reducing reliance on single-distribution assumptions. <i>This study supports SDG 14 by enhancing tools for monitoring marine ecosystem health through robust modeling of chlorophyll concentration, a key proxy for marine environmental status.</i> Integrates GoF testing, clustering, and mixture modeling Implements a reproducible workflow via MATLAB GUI Enhances robustness and positions mixture modeling within environmental data analysis.

MethodsXVol. 15
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Data Management and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.