Systematic Calibration and Validation of Discrete Element Model Parameters for Cotton Root Systems

Aiming at the problem of lacking accurate and reliable contact and bonding parameters in the discrete element simulation of whole cotton stalk harvesting equipment, this study proposed a reverse modeling method for cotton roots combining the Discrete Element Method (DEM) with 3D laser scanning. This method systematically constructed a general discrete element model and completed its parameter calibration. Firstly, cotton root samples were collected and measured to obtain key morphological parameters, providing a basis for selecting representative roots and performing 3D reverse reconstruction. Subsequently, mechanical parameters and contact parameters of the cotton roots were measured and calibrated through mechanical tests and stacking angle tests. Furthermore, based on the Hertz–Mindlin with Bonding contact model, a structured root sample model was established using a layered particle combination strategy. The bonding parameters were then optimized and calibrated through shear and tensile mechanical simulation experiments. Finally, a discrete element model of the root–soil complex was established based on the optimal parameter set. The reliability of the model was validated by comparing the simulation results with physical field tests of root extraction force. The results indicated that in the contact parameter validation test, the relative error between the simulated stacking angle and the measured value was only 0.43%, demonstrating the high accuracy of the model in simulating contact characteristics. In the bonding parameter calibration validation tests, the relative errors between the simulation results and measured values for shear and tensile mechanics were 1.22% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that the model parameters could accurately simulate shear strength and tensile strength. Finally, in the root extraction force validation test, the relative error between the simulated extraction force and the field-measured value was 3.76%, further confirming the model’s applicability for analyzing the complex interaction mechanisms between roots and soil. The findings of this study can provide key models and parameter support for the digital design, operation process simulation, and performance optimization of whole cotton stalk harvesting equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15171827
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Calibration and Validation of Discrete Element Model Parameters for Cotton Root Systems

Haodong Xu, MA Wei-bin, Yong Yue, Yasenjiang BAIKELI et al.
3 citations
Agriculture
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
2.86
article

Systematic Calibration and Validation of Discrete Element Model Parameters for Cotton Root Systems

Haodong Xu, MA Wei-bin, Yong Yue, Yasenjiang BAIKELI, L. B. Guo, Ronge Xing
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of lacking accurate and reliable contact and bonding parameters in the discrete element simulation of whole cotton stalk harvesting equipment, this study proposed a reverse modeling method for cotton roots combining the Discrete Element Method (DEM) with 3D laser scanning. This method systematically constructed a general discrete element model and completed its parameter calibration. Firstly, cotton root samples were collected and measured to obtain key morphological parameters, providing a basis for selecting representative roots and performing 3D reverse reconstruction. Subsequently, mechanical parameters and contact parameters of the cotton roots were measured and calibrated through mechanical tests and stacking angle tests. Furthermore, based on the Hertz–Mindlin with Bonding contact model, a structured root sample model was established using a layered particle combination strategy. The bonding parameters were then optimized and calibrated through shear and tensile mechanical simulation experiments. Finally, a discrete element model of the root–soil complex was established based on the optimal parameter set. The reliability of the model was validated by comparing the simulation results with physical field tests of root extraction force. The results indicated that in the contact parameter validation test, the relative error between the simulated stacking angle and the measured value was only 0.43%, demonstrating the high accuracy of the model in simulating contact characteristics. In the bonding parameter calibration validation tests, the relative errors between the simulation results and measured values for shear and tensile mechanics were 1.22% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that the model parameters could accurately simulate shear strength and tensile strength. Finally, in the root extraction force validation test, the relative error between the simulated extraction force and the field-measured value was 3.76%, further confirming the model’s applicability for analyzing the complex interaction mechanisms between roots and soil. The findings of this study can provide key models and parameter support for the digital design, operation process simulation, and performance optimization of whole cotton stalk harvesting equipment.

AgricultureVol. 15(17)
Chongqing University (CN), Xinjiang Agricultural University (CN)
Xinjiang Agricultural University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.