An Early Review of Generative Language Models in Automated Writing Evaluation: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions for Automated Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) has long supported assessment and instruction, yet existing systems struggle to capture deeper rhetorical and pedagogical aspects of student writing. Recent advances in generative language models (GLMs) such as GPT and Llama present new opportunities, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This review synthesizes 29 studies on automated essay scoring and 14 on automated writing feedback generation, examining how GLMs are applied through prompting, fine-tuning, and adaptation. Findings show GLMs can approximate human scoring and deliver richer, rubric-aligned feedback, but fairness, validity, and ethical issues remain largely unaddressed. We conclude that GLMs hold promise to enhance AWE, provided that future work establishes robust evaluation frameworks and safeguards to ensure responsible, equitable use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59863/famj7696
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Early Review of Generative Language Models in Automated Writing Evaluation: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions for Automated Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation

Runheng Liu, Corey Palermo, Yong He, Huang Yue
Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation
Topic Modeling
article

An Early Review of Generative Language Models in Automated Writing Evaluation: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions for Automated Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation

Runheng Liu, Corey Palermo, Yong He, Huang Yue
article en

Abstract

Automated writing evaluation (AWE) has long supported assessment and instruction, yet existing systems struggle to capture deeper rhetorical and pedagogical aspects of student writing. Recent advances in generative language models (GLMs) such as GPT and Llama present new opportunities, but their effectiveness remains uncertain. This review synthesizes 29 studies on automated essay scoring and 14 on automated writing feedback generation, examining how GLMs are applied through prompting, fine-tuning, and adaptation. Findings show GLMs can approximate human scoring and deliver richer, rubric-aligned feedback, but fairness, validity, and ethical issues remain largely unaddressed. We conclude that GLMs hold promise to enhance AWE, provided that future work establishes robust evaluation frameworks and safeguards to ensure responsible, equitable use.

Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation
Measurement Specialties (Germany) (DE), Industrial Measurement Systems (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Early Review of Generative Language Models in Automated Writing Evaluation: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions for Automated Essay Scoring and Feedback Generation — Runheng Liu, Corey Palermo, et al. · Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS