Measuring up: Is frequency enough for assessing adherence to muscle-strengthening guidelines?

Abstract Aim The World Health Organization (WHO) advises engaging in muscle-strengthening activities (MSAs) involving all major muscle groups on at least two days per week and at moderate or greater intensity. MSAs guideline adherence is oftentimes inferred based only on the frequency of MSAs, though. Thus, we aimed to explore the differences in MSAs guideline adherence depending on a frequency-only vs. comprehensive operationalization. Methods In a sports psychological, cross-sectional online survey, we included a questionnaire that assessed whether participants engaged in MSAs and whether they performed them according to the WHO guideline on at least two days per week, at moderate or greater intensity, and involving all major muscle groups. A convenience sample was recruited via advertisements online and offline (e.g., in fitness centers). Results Data were available for 235 (after exclusions) adults, who were mostly young and middle-aged, well-educated, and physically active. 71.1% of participants reported performing MSAs. 55.7% of participants reported performing MSAs on at least two days per week, whereas only 26.8% met all three components of the WHO guideline on MSAs. Not training all major muscle groups was a major barrier to MSAs guideline adherence. Conclusion Our results indicate the importance of considering all components of the WHO guideline on MSAs (frequency, intensity, involved muscle groups) for inferring guideline adherence, as a frequency-only operationalization may overestimate MSAs guideline adherence substantially.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-025-02596-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring up: Is frequency enough for assessing adherence to muscle-strengthening guidelines?

Julian Brummer, Emilia Hoffmann, Martin G. Köllner, Florian Herbolsheimer et al.
1 citations
Journal of Public Health
Physical Activity and Health
1.16
article

Measuring up: Is frequency enough for assessing adherence to muscle-strengthening guidelines?

Julian Brummer, Emilia Hoffmann, Martin G. Köllner, Florian Herbolsheimer, Karen Steindorf, Philipp Stang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim The World Health Organization (WHO) advises engaging in muscle-strengthening activities (MSAs) involving all major muscle groups on at least two days per week and at moderate or greater intensity. MSAs guideline adherence is oftentimes inferred based only on the frequency of MSAs, though. Thus, we aimed to explore the differences in MSAs guideline adherence depending on a frequency-only vs. comprehensive operationalization. Methods In a sports psychological, cross-sectional online survey, we included a questionnaire that assessed whether participants engaged in MSAs and whether they performed them according to the WHO guideline on at least two days per week, at moderate or greater intensity, and involving all major muscle groups. A convenience sample was recruited via advertisements online and offline (e.g., in fitness centers). Results Data were available for 235 (after exclusions) adults, who were mostly young and middle-aged, well-educated, and physically active. 71.1% of participants reported performing MSAs. 55.7% of participants reported performing MSAs on at least two days per week, whereas only 26.8% met all three components of the WHO guideline on MSAs. Not training all major muscle groups was a major barrier to MSAs guideline adherence. Conclusion Our results indicate the importance of considering all components of the WHO guideline on MSAs (frequency, intensity, involved muscle groups) for inferring guideline adherence, as a frequency-only operationalization may overestimate MSAs guideline adherence substantially.

Journal of Public Health
German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), SRH University of Applied Sciences Heidelberg (DE), UMIT - Private Universität für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Medizinische Informatik und Technik (AT), Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Physical Activity and Health
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.