It’s all to play for: how competition law is shaping the regulation of sport

Competition law is increasingly shaping the regulation of sport. Recent jurisprudence has revealed this in two ways. First, sporting regulations – the rules set by sports governing bodies – have been found unlawfully to restrict competition by object. Second, the implementation of such rules by sports governing bodies has been held to constitute the abuse of a dominant position. The seminal case of European Superleague v. UEFA materially developed the law in this respect: it clarified that regulatory provisions which may affect the parameters of economic competition must be situated within a substantively and procedurally sound framework if they are successfully to withstand a competition law challenge. Nevertheless, as revealed by other recent case law, sporting regulations remain subject to potential attack on more traditional competition law grounds. This article draws out various points of principle from this recent jurisprudence and considers how the trend toward further litigation may continue to influence regulatory developments in sport for years to come.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Competition Law Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2025.01.07
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

It’s all to play for: how competition law is shaping the regulation of sport

Haris Ismail
Competition Law Journal
Doping in Sports
article

It’s all to play for: how competition law is shaping the regulation of sport

Haris Ismail
article en

Abstract

Competition law is increasingly shaping the regulation of sport. Recent jurisprudence has revealed this in two ways. First, sporting regulations – the rules set by sports governing bodies – have been found unlawfully to restrict competition by object. Second, the implementation of such rules by sports governing bodies has been held to constitute the abuse of a dominant position. The seminal case of European Superleague v. UEFA materially developed the law in this respect: it clarified that regulatory provisions which may affect the parameters of economic competition must be situated within a substantively and procedurally sound framework if they are successfully to withstand a competition law challenge. Nevertheless, as revealed by other recent case law, sporting regulations remain subject to potential attack on more traditional competition law grounds. This article draws out various points of principle from this recent jurisprudence and considers how the trend toward further litigation may continue to influence regulatory developments in sport for years to come.

Competition Law JournalVol. 24(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

It’s all to play for: how competition law is shaping the regulation of sport — Haris Ismail · Competition Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS