Legal arbitrage in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: consumer claims as competition collective proceedings

This article explores emerging trends within the UK’s collective proceedings regime, specifically the rise of quasi-consumer, quasi-follow-on, and perhaps soon, quasi-consumer-follow-on claims, before the Competition Appeal Tribunal. It investigates the incentives created by procedural advantages exclusive to competition law claims, encouraging claimants to frame consumer-related harms as breaches of competition law. This article analyses the overlaps and divergences between competition and consumer law, especially regarding the scope of the two regimes and their interpretations of fairness. The article also considers how quasi-consumer cases may relate to the concept of competition on the merits and breaches of the Chapter I prohibition of the Competition Act 1998.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Competition Law Journal
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2025.01.04
Primary Topic
European and International Contract Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal arbitrage in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: consumer claims as competition collective proceedings

R. J. O’Brien
Competition Law Journal
European and International Contract Law
article

Legal arbitrage in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: consumer claims as competition collective proceedings

R. J. O’Brien
article en

Abstract

This article explores emerging trends within the UK’s collective proceedings regime, specifically the rise of quasi-consumer, quasi-follow-on, and perhaps soon, quasi-consumer-follow-on claims, before the Competition Appeal Tribunal. It investigates the incentives created by procedural advantages exclusive to competition law claims, encouraging claimants to frame consumer-related harms as breaches of competition law. This article analyses the overlaps and divergences between competition and consumer law, especially regarding the scope of the two regimes and their interpretations of fairness. The article also considers how quasi-consumer cases may relate to the concept of competition on the merits and breaches of the Chapter I prohibition of the Competition Act 1998.

Competition Law JournalVol. 24(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
European and International Contract Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal arbitrage in the Competition Appeal Tribunal: consumer claims as competition collective proceedings — R. J. O’Brien · Competition Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS