Conduct Governance Assurance - An Architecture Implementation for High-Risk Autonomous Systems

As we place robotic systems into more complex environments and introduce increased reliance on autonomous decision making, trust in autonomous robotic planners becomes essential. Real-world environments can require a system to moderate its actions according to legal or ethical requirements as well as the usual functional requirements. In this paper, we present an implementation of a reference architecture for a robotic system that integrates conduct governance within the perception, tracking, and response pipeline. We define conduct governance as the concept that an autonomous system can interpret a set of rules for its operating domain, and implement components that are designed to act as a safeguard to ensure that autonomous decisions are aligned with these rules and ethical and safety-oriented system requirements. We implemented the reference’s patterns and practices to react to visual targets, while adhering to changing sets of high-level conduct rules. We found that, compared to traditional uses of machine learning models, the conduct governance architecture enables a higher level of observability and traceability into autonomous and intelligent systems, and provides tunable guardrails around systems that may be running one or more machine learning models. We also present lessons learned from implementing such an architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eras63351.2025.11135698
Primary Topic
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conduct Governance Assurance - An Architecture Implementation for High-Risk Autonomous Systems

Eugene Newman, Tyler Brooks, Andrew Schellenberg, Charles Loughin
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
article

Conduct Governance Assurance - An Architecture Implementation for High-Risk Autonomous Systems

Eugene Newman, Tyler Brooks, Andrew Schellenberg, Charles Loughin
article en

Abstract

As we place robotic systems into more complex environments and introduce increased reliance on autonomous decision making, trust in autonomous robotic planners becomes essential. Real-world environments can require a system to moderate its actions according to legal or ethical requirements as well as the usual functional requirements. In this paper, we present an implementation of a reference architecture for a robotic system that integrates conduct governance within the perception, tracking, and response pipeline. We define conduct governance as the concept that an autonomous system can interpret a set of rules for its operating domain, and implement components that are designed to act as a safeguard to ensure that autonomous decisions are aligned with these rules and ethical and safety-oriented system requirements. We implemented the reference’s patterns and practices to react to visual targets, while adhering to changing sets of high-level conduct rules. We found that, compared to traditional uses of machine learning models, the conduct governance architecture enables a higher level of observability and traceability into autonomous and intelligent systems, and provides tunable guardrails around systems that may be running one or more machine learning models. We also present lessons learned from implementing such an architecture.

Software Engineering Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.