A Comparison Between SqueeSAR and CAESAR for the Detection of Decorrelating Scatterers

Monitoring displacements with interferometric synthetic aperture radar involves, as final processing stage, the detection of persistent/distributed scatterers. Filtering and multilook is adopted to improve the detection performances in non-urbanized areas, where dominant point scattering mechanisms are less frequent. SqueeSAR and CAESAR based detectors were already compared in [1] under the hypothesis of weak and fully correlated scattering. In this work we extend the comparison to account for the presence of scattering decorrelation. The comparison is carried out by analyzing simulated data as well as data acquired by the COSMO-SkyMed constellation. In both cases the detection based on CAESAR outperforms the one based on SqueeSAR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/lgrs.2025.3603266
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison Between SqueeSAR and CAESAR for the Detection of Decorrelating Scatterers

Diego Reale, G. Fornaro, Antonio Pauciullo, Cosmin Dănişor et al.
1 citations
IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
4.99
article

A Comparison Between SqueeSAR and CAESAR for the Detection of Decorrelating Scatterers

Diego Reale, G. Fornaro, Antonio Pauciullo, Cosmin Dănişor, Simona Verde
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Monitoring displacements with interferometric synthetic aperture radar involves, as final processing stage, the detection of persistent/distributed scatterers. Filtering and multilook is adopted to improve the detection performances in non-urbanized areas, where dominant point scattering mechanisms are less frequent. SqueeSAR and CAESAR based detectors were already compared in [1] under the hypothesis of weak and fully correlated scattering. In this work we extend the comparison to account for the presence of scattering decorrelation. The comparison is carried out by analyzing simulated data as well as data acquired by the COSMO-SkyMed constellation. In both cases the detection based on CAESAR outperforms the one based on SqueeSAR.

IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersVol. 22
National Research Council (IT)
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison Between SqueeSAR and CAESAR for the Detection of Decorrelating Scatterers — Diego Reale, G. Fornaro, et al. · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS