Comparative analysis of structural steel design of IS vs. AISC code standards

This Research presents a comparative evaluation of steel structures designed using Indian Standard (IS) and American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) codes, focusing on structural performance, material strength and deformation behavior. The analysis reveals significant differences due to variations in design philosophy, safety factors and material specifications. AISC W18X46 sections demonstrate superior working load capacity (3185.78 kN) compared to ISMB300 (2387.47 kN), while IS100X100X8 angles exhibit higher yield strength than AISC L4X4X5/16. AISC sections show lower shear strength, potentially due to more conservative evaluation methods. Deflection analysis indicates AISC beams outperform IS beams by reducing deflections by 6.5% to 12%, attributed to higher moments of inertia and stricter serviceability limits. Axial force values in AISC beams are 5.47% to 8.07% lower, suggesting optimized load distribution and better material utilization. Similarly, bending moments are reduced by 3.77% to 6.18% in AISC designs, reflecting improved structural efficiency. Stress ratio variations between the two codes remain minimal (0.11%–0.20%), ensuring safety in both approaches. The study concludes that while both IS and AISC provide safe structural designs, AISC offers enhanced performance and efficiency, making it preferable for high-performance, cost-effective applications depending on project demands and regional design standards.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2025-717st0302rs
Primary Topic
Engineering Applied Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of structural steel design of IS vs. AISC code standards

Saravanan Rajendran, R Parthasaarathi, Senthil Kumar R, J. Balaji Praveen et al.
Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
Engineering Applied Research
article

Comparative analysis of structural steel design of IS vs. AISC code standards

Saravanan Rajendran, R Parthasaarathi, Senthil Kumar R, J. Balaji Praveen, Manish Kumar
article en

Abstract

This Research presents a comparative evaluation of steel structures designed using Indian Standard (IS) and American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) codes, focusing on structural performance, material strength and deformation behavior. The analysis reveals significant differences due to variations in design philosophy, safety factors and material specifications. AISC W18X46 sections demonstrate superior working load capacity (3185.78 kN) compared to ISMB300 (2387.47 kN), while IS100X100X8 angles exhibit higher yield strength than AISC L4X4X5/16. AISC sections show lower shear strength, potentially due to more conservative evaluation methods. Deflection analysis indicates AISC beams outperform IS beams by reducing deflections by 6.5% to 12%, attributed to higher moments of inertia and stricter serviceability limits. Axial force values in AISC beams are 5.47% to 8.07% lower, suggesting optimized load distribution and better material utilization. Similarly, bending moments are reduced by 3.77% to 6.18% in AISC designs, reflecting improved structural efficiency. Stress ratio variations between the two codes remain minimal (0.11%–0.20%), ensuring safety in both approaches. The study concludes that while both IS and AISC provide safe structural designs, AISC offers enhanced performance and efficiency, making it preferable for high-performance, cost-effective applications depending on project demands and regional design standards.

Research on Engineering Structures and Materials
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Engineering Applied Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of structural steel design of IS vs. AISC code standards — Saravanan Rajendran, R Parthasaarathi, et al. · Research on Engineering Structures and Materials (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS