The IARC Monographs Program – sowing public confusion, controversy, and criticism: a commentary

Summary This article focuses on the Monographs Program, established to address the growing need for cancer classifications of chemicals and other agents. Part I provides an overview of the Program, its global impact, and how International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (IARC) cancer classifications are relied on by U.S. regulatory agencies. Part II discusses two controversial cancer classification decisions involving glyphosate and aspartame, both of which serve to showcase the Monographs Program’s persistent and controversial decision-making process. Indeed, the Program’s cancer classifications continue to roil U.S. federal agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Toxicology and Regulatory Policy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69982/jtrp-25-0003
Primary Topic
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The IARC Monographs Program – sowing public confusion, controversy, and criticism: a commentary

David B. Fischer
Journal of Toxicology and Regulatory Policy
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
article

The IARC Monographs Program – sowing public confusion, controversy, and criticism: a commentary

David B. Fischer
article en

Abstract

Summary This article focuses on the Monographs Program, established to address the growing need for cancer classifications of chemicals and other agents. Part I provides an overview of the Program, its global impact, and how International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (IARC) cancer classifications are relied on by U.S. regulatory agencies. Part II discusses two controversial cancer classification decisions involving glyphosate and aspartame, both of which serve to showcase the Monographs Program’s persistent and controversial decision-making process. Indeed, the Program’s cancer classifications continue to roil U.S. federal agencies.

Journal of Toxicology and Regulatory PolicyVol. 1(1)
J. J. Keller & Associates (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Nuclear and radioactivity studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.