Classical certification of quantum gates under the dimension assumption

The rapid advancement of quantum hardware necessitates the development of reliable methods to certify its correct functioning. However, existing certification tests fall short, as they either suffer from systematic errors or do not guarantee that only a correctly functioning quantum device can pass the test. We introduce a certification method for quantum gates tailored for a practical server-user scenario, where a classical user tests the results of exact quantum computations performed by a quantum server. This method is free from the systematic state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. For single-qubit gates, including those that form a universal set for single-qubit quantum computation, we demonstrate that our approach offers soundness guarantees based solely on the dimension assumption. Additionally, for a highly-relevant phase gate – which corresponds experimentally to a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>&amp;#x03C0;</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:math>-pulse – we prove that the method's sample complexity scales as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>&amp;#x03B5;</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>&amp;#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> relative to the average gate infidelity <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>&amp;#x03B5;</mml:mi></mml:math>. By combining the SPAM-error-free and sound notion of certification with practical applicability, our approach paves the way for promising research into efficient and reliable certification methods for full-scale quantum computation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quantum
Published
2025-08-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-08-08-1825
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classical certification of quantum gates under the dimension assumption

Nikolai Miklin, Martin Kliesch, Mariami Gachechiladze, Jan Nöller
2 citations
Quantum
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
article

Classical certification of quantum gates under the dimension assumption

Nikolai Miklin, Martin Kliesch, Mariami Gachechiladze, Jan Nöller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The rapid advancement of quantum hardware necessitates the development of reliable methods to certify its correct functioning. However, existing certification tests fall short, as they either suffer from systematic errors or do not guarantee that only a correctly functioning quantum device can pass the test. We introduce a certification method for quantum gates tailored for a practical server-user scenario, where a classical user tests the results of exact quantum computations performed by a quantum server. This method is free from the systematic state preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. For single-qubit gates, including those that form a universal set for single-qubit quantum computation, we demonstrate that our approach offers soundness guarantees based solely on the dimension assumption. Additionally, for a highly-relevant phase gate – which corresponds experimentally to a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>&amp;#x03C0;</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:math>-pulse – we prove that the method's sample complexity scales as <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>&amp;#x03B5;</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"><mml:mo>&amp;#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> relative to the average gate infidelity <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>&amp;#x03B5;</mml:mi></mml:math>. By combining the SPAM-error-free and sound notion of certification with practical applicability, our approach paves the way for promising research into efficient and reliable certification methods for full-scale quantum computation.

QuantumVol. 9
Universität Hamburg (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.