Modern Slavery Disclosure in the G20: Firm and National-Level Insights

The urgency for firms to disclose modern slavery practices has increased in light of global human rights concerns. This study investigates the firm-level and country-level determinants that influence modern slavery disclosure using panel data from 6,757 firm-year observations across listed firms in G20 countries (2015–2020). Data from the listed firm in the G20 countries were used. These nations have contributed most of the world's GDP and share the objective of adhering to modern slavery standards. Employing a panel data regression model with fixed effects and robust standard errors, grounded in neo-institutional and stakeholder theories, the analysis incorporates variables such as corporate governance, firm size, profitability, state governance, and legal system. Secondary data were collected from the Thomson Reuters Eikon and World Bank databases. The results indicate that firm governance (β = 0.0623; p < 0.01), firm size (β = 1.31; p < 0.01), country-level governance (β = 3.69; p < 0.01), and civil law legal system (β = 12.74; p < 0.01) have a statistically significant positive impact on modern slavery disclosure. Profitability is found to have no significant influence (p > 0.10). The final model explains 21.6% of the variance in disclosure (R² = 0.216). These findings demonstrate that both firm-internal characteristics and national institutional contexts play a decisive role in shaping disclosure practices, with firms in civil law countries and those with stronger governance frameworks reporting substantially higher levels of information. This study contributes to the literature in several ways. First, it provides large-scale empirical evidence across multiple countries, addressing the lack of cross-country analyses in prior research. Second, it integrates firm-level and country-level determinants within a unified model, offering new insights into how internal resources and external pressures jointly influence modern slavery transparency. Finally, by highlighting the non-significance of profitability, this research challenges assumptions that stronger financial performance automatically leads to more ethical disclosure, thereby expanding the theoretical understanding of disclosure behavior. Firms have varying levels of disclosure of modern slavery. Businesses and investors have an obligation to uphold human rights in their supply chains and combat modern forms of slavery, including forced labor and human trafficking. Overall, the results underscore the importance of robust corporate governance, institutional quality, and legal frameworks in promoting accountability and transparency in addressing modern slavery risks..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Akuntansi
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33369/jakuntansi.15.2.130-156
Primary Topic
Corruption and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern Slavery Disclosure in the G20: Firm and National-Level Insights

Vidya Intani Athfalina
Jurnal Akuntansi
Corruption and Economic Development
article

Modern Slavery Disclosure in the G20: Firm and National-Level Insights

Vidya Intani Athfalina
article en

Abstract

The urgency for firms to disclose modern slavery practices has increased in light of global human rights concerns. This study investigates the firm-level and country-level determinants that influence modern slavery disclosure using panel data from 6,757 firm-year observations across listed firms in G20 countries (2015–2020). Data from the listed firm in the G20 countries were used. These nations have contributed most of the world's GDP and share the objective of adhering to modern slavery standards. Employing a panel data regression model with fixed effects and robust standard errors, grounded in neo-institutional and stakeholder theories, the analysis incorporates variables such as corporate governance, firm size, profitability, state governance, and legal system. Secondary data were collected from the Thomson Reuters Eikon and World Bank databases. The results indicate that firm governance (β = 0.0623; p < 0.01), firm size (β = 1.31; p < 0.01), country-level governance (β = 3.69; p < 0.01), and civil law legal system (β = 12.74; p < 0.01) have a statistically significant positive impact on modern slavery disclosure. Profitability is found to have no significant influence (p > 0.10). The final model explains 21.6% of the variance in disclosure (R² = 0.216). These findings demonstrate that both firm-internal characteristics and national institutional contexts play a decisive role in shaping disclosure practices, with firms in civil law countries and those with stronger governance frameworks reporting substantially higher levels of information. This study contributes to the literature in several ways. First, it provides large-scale empirical evidence across multiple countries, addressing the lack of cross-country analyses in prior research. Second, it integrates firm-level and country-level determinants within a unified model, offering new insights into how internal resources and external pressures jointly influence modern slavery transparency. Finally, by highlighting the non-significance of profitability, this research challenges assumptions that stronger financial performance automatically leads to more ethical disclosure, thereby expanding the theoretical understanding of disclosure behavior. Firms have varying levels of disclosure of modern slavery. Businesses and investors have an obligation to uphold human rights in their supply chains and combat modern forms of slavery, including forced labor and human trafficking. Overall, the results underscore the importance of robust corporate governance, institutional quality, and legal frameworks in promoting accountability and transparency in addressing modern slavery risks..

Jurnal AkuntansiVol. 15(2)
Universitas Airlangga (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Corruption and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.