Comparative Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Colon Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complications, Recovery Times, and Long-Term Survival

Background Open and laparoscopic colon surgeries are both common interventions for benign and malignant colonic diseases. Evidence regarding their comparative effectiveness on postoperative and long-term outcomes remains mixed. This study aimed to evaluate differences in complications, recovery times, and survival between the two approaches using propensity score matching to reduce selection bias. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 600 patients undergoing colon surgery: 218 (36.3%) open, 168 (28.0%) laparoscopic, and 214 (35.7%) robotic-assisted procedures. Mean age was 56 years (range: 18-88), with an equal sex distribution. Indications included benign disease (51.7%) and malignancy (48.3%), predominantly Stage III colorectal cancer (56.5%). Outcomes included postoperative complications, pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Results Postoperative complications occurred in 80% of patients, most frequently deep vein thrombosis (21.5%), anastomotic leak (19.8%), and infection (19.3%), with no significant difference between surgical groups (p = 0.493). Laparoscopic surgery resulted in significantly lower pain scores (mean: 4.5 versus 5.7; p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.23) and shorter LOS (mean: 4.2 versus 6.3 days; p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.38) compared to open surgery. Thirty-day mortality rates were similar across groups (p = 0.633). Cardiovascular disease (HR = 2.01, p = 0.004), diabetes (HR = 1.85, p = 0.008), and lower socioeconomic status were significant predictors of long-term mortality and prolonged recovery. Conclusion Laparoscopic colon surgery offers significant short-term advantages in pain reduction and hospitalization length but does not reduce complication rates or improve long-term survival compared to open surgery. Comorbidities and socioeconomic disparities have greater influence on long-term outcomes than surgical technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.90984
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Colon Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complications, Recovery Times, and Long-Term Survival

Muhammad Rizwan Umer, Sarosh Khan Jadoon, Amir Iqbal Ali, Ahmad Khan et al.
Cureus
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Comparative Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Colon Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complications, Recovery Times, and Long-Term Survival

Muhammad Rizwan Umer, Sarosh Khan Jadoon, Amir Iqbal Ali, Ahmad Khan, Madeeha Subhan Waleed, Ayman M. Atta, Adnan Mehraj, Saddam Hussain, Kawsari Akhter
article en

Abstract

Background Open and laparoscopic colon surgeries are both common interventions for benign and malignant colonic diseases. Evidence regarding their comparative effectiveness on postoperative and long-term outcomes remains mixed. This study aimed to evaluate differences in complications, recovery times, and survival between the two approaches using propensity score matching to reduce selection bias. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 600 patients undergoing colon surgery: 218 (36.3%) open, 168 (28.0%) laparoscopic, and 214 (35.7%) robotic-assisted procedures. Mean age was 56 years (range: 18-88), with an equal sex distribution. Indications included benign disease (51.7%) and malignancy (48.3%), predominantly Stage III colorectal cancer (56.5%). Outcomes included postoperative complications, pain scores, length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Results Postoperative complications occurred in 80% of patients, most frequently deep vein thrombosis (21.5%), anastomotic leak (19.8%), and infection (19.3%), with no significant difference between surgical groups (p = 0.493). Laparoscopic surgery resulted in significantly lower pain scores (mean: 4.5 versus 5.7; p = 0.009, Cohen's d = 0.23) and shorter LOS (mean: 4.2 versus 6.3 days; p = 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.38) compared to open surgery. Thirty-day mortality rates were similar across groups (p = 0.633). Cardiovascular disease (HR = 2.01, p = 0.004), diabetes (HR = 1.85, p = 0.008), and lower socioeconomic status were significant predictors of long-term mortality and prolonged recovery. Conclusion Laparoscopic colon surgery offers significant short-term advantages in pain reduction and hospitalization length but does not reduce complication rates or improve long-term survival compared to open surgery. Comorbidities and socioeconomic disparities have greater influence on long-term outcomes than surgical technique.

CureusVol. 17(8)
University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (PK), Hamdard University (PK), Royal Sussex County Hospital (GB), Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (GB), Combined Military Hospital (PK), Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.