Assessing Soil Carbon Sequestration Through Cover Crops: The Role of Implicit Costs in Alabama Cotton Fields

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the economic feasibility of carbon sequestration through cover cropping in Alabama cotton fields, emphasizing the role of implicit costs, proxied by cash rent and reflecting land productivity and market proximity. Using a cost‐efficiency optimization model, we compare carbon supply curves under two cost assumptions: one with explicit costs and another with both explicit and implicit costs. While the carbon supply appears nearly linear with explicit costs alone, adding implicit costs sharply raises sequestration costs, revealing diminishing carbon sequestration efficiency. Spatial analysis highlights regional disparities driven by land values, underscoring the need for targeted, region‐specific policy incentives to strengthen the effectiveness of agricultural carbon markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70019
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Soil Carbon Sequestration Through Cover Crops: The Role of Implicit Costs in Alabama Cotton Fields

Sunjae Won, Seong‐Hoon Cho, Mykel R. Taylor
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Assessing Soil Carbon Sequestration Through Cover Crops: The Role of Implicit Costs in Alabama Cotton Fields

Sunjae Won, Seong‐Hoon Cho, Mykel R. Taylor
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluates the economic feasibility of carbon sequestration through cover cropping in Alabama cotton fields, emphasizing the role of implicit costs, proxied by cash rent and reflecting land productivity and market proximity. Using a cost‐efficiency optimization model, we compare carbon supply curves under two cost assumptions: one with explicit costs and another with both explicit and implicit costs. While the carbon supply appears nearly linear with explicit costs alone, adding implicit costs sharply raises sequestration costs, revealing diminishing carbon sequestration efficiency. Spatial analysis highlights regional disparities driven by land values, underscoring the need for targeted, region‐specific policy incentives to strengthen the effectiveness of agricultural carbon markets.

Applied Economic Perspectives and PolicyVol. 48(1)
Knoxville College (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.