Determination of the Degree of Penetration of Glass Ionomer Cements in the Healthy and Decayed Dentine of Permanent Molars

This study aimed to evaluate the penetration and bonding performance of three restorative materials-high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Riva Self Cure HV), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Riva Light Cure) and a bioactive resin (Activa BioActive Restorative™)-in the healthy and carious dentine of permanent molars. Forty extracted human molars with sound or decayed dentine were restored following standardised protocols and subsequently divided into slices. So, twenty-four samples were used for each group (sound and carious dentine) for interface analysis using confocal laser scanning microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and another eight simples were used for each group (sound and carious dentine) for Vickers microhardness testing. Results showed that both glass ionomer cements achieved consistent chemical bonding in healthy dentine and demonstrated better interfacial adaptation compared to carious dentine, where partially demineralised areas showed weaker bonding. The bioactive resin exhibited good adhesion in sound dentine due to the adhesive system but showed poorer interaction in decayed dentine with signs of interfacial separation. Elemental analysis revealed similar compositions among materials, with no significant differences in material concentrations among the ionomers, while there were significant differences with the other materials. On the other hand, some variations were observed in the sulphur, fluoride and strontium content depending on dentine condition. Microhardness values were higher in healthy dentine than in carious dentine for all materials (<i>p</i> < 0.001), except the high-viscosity glass ionomer, which maintained stable hardness in both substrates (36.33 ± 6.23 VHN vs. 34.56 ± 4.31 VHN; <i>p</i> = 0.605). These findings highlight the relevance of material selection and dentine condition in minimally invasive restorative dentistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18173984
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determination of the Degree of Penetration of Glass Ionomer Cements in the Healthy and Decayed Dentine of Permanent Molars

Andrea Poza-Pascual, Inmaculada Cabello, Antonio José Ortiz Ruiz, Clara Serna‐Muñoz et al.
1 citations
Materials
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
article

Determination of the Degree of Penetration of Glass Ionomer Cements in the Healthy and Decayed Dentine of Permanent Molars

Andrea Poza-Pascual, Inmaculada Cabello, Antonio José Ortiz Ruiz, Clara Serna‐Muñoz, Pilar Valverde-Rubio, Pilar Cereceda-Villaescusa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the penetration and bonding performance of three restorative materials-high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Riva Self Cure HV), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Riva Light Cure) and a bioactive resin (Activa BioActive Restorative™)-in the healthy and carious dentine of permanent molars. Forty extracted human molars with sound or decayed dentine were restored following standardised protocols and subsequently divided into slices. So, twenty-four samples were used for each group (sound and carious dentine) for interface analysis using confocal laser scanning microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and another eight simples were used for each group (sound and carious dentine) for Vickers microhardness testing. Results showed that both glass ionomer cements achieved consistent chemical bonding in healthy dentine and demonstrated better interfacial adaptation compared to carious dentine, where partially demineralised areas showed weaker bonding. The bioactive resin exhibited good adhesion in sound dentine due to the adhesive system but showed poorer interaction in decayed dentine with signs of interfacial separation. Elemental analysis revealed similar compositions among materials, with no significant differences in material concentrations among the ionomers, while there were significant differences with the other materials. On the other hand, some variations were observed in the sulphur, fluoride and strontium content depending on dentine condition. Microhardness values were higher in healthy dentine than in carious dentine for all materials (<i>p</i> < 0.001), except the high-viscosity glass ionomer, which maintained stable hardness in both substrates (36.33 ± 6.23 VHN vs. 34.56 ± 4.31 VHN; <i>p</i> = 0.605). These findings highlight the relevance of material selection and dentine condition in minimally invasive restorative dentistry.

MaterialsVol. 18(17)
University of the Basque Country (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Dental materials and restorations
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.