Whither Human Factors in the Era of AI?

This commentary is inspired by two recent articles in the journal Ergonomics that seem to call in question the purposes and necessity of our discipline of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E). I would like to counter with the argument that there is nothing new under the sun, that the operating environment of HF/E has not changed since foundation of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) in 1957, and that we, as members of HFES and researchers and practitioners of HF/E, have much to contribute as advocates for humans in the increasingly technological society. This, however, will require refocusing our mission to human (emphasis added) factors, away from technique. Three areas in particular should be addressed: Research methods to keep up with developments in artificial intelligence, policy and advocacy, and broader perspectives to include also philosophical questions about human flourishing and ultimate purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813251366292
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whither Human Factors in the Era of AI?

Esa M. Rantanen
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Whither Human Factors in the Era of AI?

Esa M. Rantanen
article en

Abstract

This commentary is inspired by two recent articles in the journal Ergonomics that seem to call in question the purposes and necessity of our discipline of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E). I would like to counter with the argument that there is nothing new under the sun, that the operating environment of HF/E has not changed since foundation of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) in 1957, and that we, as members of HFES and researchers and practitioners of HF/E, have much to contribute as advocates for humans in the increasingly technological society. This, however, will require refocusing our mission to human (emphasis added) factors, away from technique. Three areas in particular should be addressed: Research methods to keep up with developments in artificial intelligence, policy and advocacy, and broader perspectives to include also philosophical questions about human flourishing and ultimate purpose.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingVol. 69(1)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.