Mathematics of Stock Valuation: Why the Potential Payback Period (PPP) Outperforms the <i>P</i>/<i>E</i> and PEG Ratios

This article introduces the Potential Payback Period (PPP), a valuation model initiated by the author, as a mathematically rigorous and conceptually richer alternative to traditional ratios. While the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and PEG ratios have long been used to assess stock value, they suffer from critical limitations: the P/E ignores growth and discounting, while the PEG applies a simplistic linear adjustment and neglects risk. The PPP corrects these shortcomings by incorporating earnings growth, interest rates, and risk (via CAPM-based discounting) into a unified logarithmic structure. Using tools such as the Gordon Growth Model, Taylor expansion, and L’Hospital’s Rule, the paper shows that the P/E and PEG ratios are special cases of the PPP [1]-[3]. As a result, the PPP offers a more consistent, interpretable, and forward-looking metric that aligns with modern financial theory and investor needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematical Finance
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2025.153027
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mathematics of Stock Valuation: Why the Potential Payback Period (PPP) Outperforms the P/E and PEG Ratios

Rainsy Sam
2 citations
Journal of Mathematical Finance
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
4.45
article

Mathematics of Stock Valuation: Why the Potential Payback Period (PPP) Outperforms the P/E and PEG Ratios

Rainsy Sam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article introduces the Potential Payback Period (PPP), a valuation model initiated by the author, as a mathematically rigorous and conceptually richer alternative to traditional ratios. While the Price-to-Earnings (P/E) and PEG ratios have long been used to assess stock value, they suffer from critical limitations: the P/E ignores growth and discounting, while the PEG applies a simplistic linear adjustment and neglects risk. The PPP corrects these shortcomings by incorporating earnings growth, interest rates, and risk (via CAPM-based discounting) into a unified logarithmic structure. Using tools such as the Gordon Growth Model, Taylor expansion, and L’Hospital’s Rule, the paper shows that the P/E and PEG ratios are special cases of the PPP [1]-[3]. As a result, the PPP offers a more consistent, interpretable, and forward-looking metric that aligns with modern financial theory and investor needs.

Journal of Mathematical FinanceVol. 15(03)
International University in Geneva (CH)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mathematics of Stock Valuation: Why the Potential Payback Period (PPP) Outperforms the <i>P</i>/<i>E</i> and PEG Ratios — Rainsy Sam · Journal of Mathematical Finance (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS