Medieval Jaina History and Prakrit Literature

Christine Chojnacki’s Voix et échos du roman-poème en prakrit is an in-depth study of eleven medieval Jaina Prakrit roman-poèmes (romance-poems or novel- poems). She argues that a fuller history of Indian kāvya literature needs to move beyond the standard treatment only of texts in Sanskrit to include Prakrit as well. Scholars have tended to ignore or dismiss these Prakrit texts. Chojnacki argues that this is a mistake that has had a deleterious effect upon the history of medieval Indian belles-lettres. Chojnacki’s book also addresses an important question of medieval Śvetāmbara Jaina history: what were the differences between the earlier monastic lineages that called themselves kulas and the later ones that called themselves gacchas? Almost all of the evidence scholars have used to investigate this topic has come from texts written by gaccha polemicists. The authorship of the texts Chojnacki studies is fairly evenly split between the two monastic styles. But neither an analysis of the content of the roman-poèmes nor the paratextual evidence coming from the authors’ prefaces and colophons supports the standard sharp division between the two. Instead we have a picture of the two coexisting for centuries, and the kulas only gradually disappearing for as yet still unknown reasons.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7817/jaos.145.2.2025.ra001
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medieval Jaina History and Prakrit Literature

John E. Cort
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

Medieval Jaina History and Prakrit Literature

John E. Cort
article en

Abstract

Christine Chojnacki’s Voix et échos du roman-poème en prakrit is an in-depth study of eleven medieval Jaina Prakrit roman-poèmes (romance-poems or novel- poems). She argues that a fuller history of Indian kāvya literature needs to move beyond the standard treatment only of texts in Sanskrit to include Prakrit as well. Scholars have tended to ignore or dismiss these Prakrit texts. Chojnacki argues that this is a mistake that has had a deleterious effect upon the history of medieval Indian belles-lettres. Chojnacki’s book also addresses an important question of medieval Śvetāmbara Jaina history: what were the differences between the earlier monastic lineages that called themselves kulas and the later ones that called themselves gacchas? Almost all of the evidence scholars have used to investigate this topic has come from texts written by gaccha polemicists. The authorship of the texts Chojnacki studies is fairly evenly split between the two monastic styles. But neither an analysis of the content of the roman-poèmes nor the paratextual evidence coming from the authors’ prefaces and colophons supports the standard sharp division between the two. Instead we have a picture of the two coexisting for centuries, and the kulas only gradually disappearing for as yet still unknown reasons.

Journal of the American Oriental SocietyVol. 145(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.