Quality in simultaneous interpreting with text: A corpus-based case study

Simultaneous interpreting (SI) of read speeches using the speaker’s script in the booth (‘SI with text’) is a common practice, particularly in conferences of the United Nations (UN), but little is known about its effect on the quality of interpreters’ output. The present study investigates material from a corpus of authentic English–Chinese SI at a UN conference to establish whether SI with text is beneficial or detrimental to the quality of the interpretation, assessed for accuracy and completeness based on a graded (minor/major/critical) typology of non-correspondence as well as for target-language form and delivery. The corpus-based comparison between the two interpreting modes shows a ‘mixed’ effect of working with the script, with improvements in accuracy for details, such as names, numbers and terms, but a higher risk of critical information loss and a negative impact on fluency. The implications of these findings for interpreter-mediated multilingual communication in the world’s most important forum for international cooperation are discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Specialised Translation
Published
2025-07-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26034/cm.jostrans.2025.8472
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality in simultaneous interpreting with text: A corpus-based case study

Franz Pöchhacker, Lin Zhao
1 links
The Journal of Specialised Translation
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Quality in simultaneous interpreting with text: A corpus-based case study

Franz Pöchhacker, Lin Zhao
article en

Abstract

Simultaneous interpreting (SI) of read speeches using the speaker’s script in the booth (‘SI with text’) is a common practice, particularly in conferences of the United Nations (UN), but little is known about its effect on the quality of interpreters’ output. The present study investigates material from a corpus of authentic English–Chinese SI at a UN conference to establish whether SI with text is beneficial or detrimental to the quality of the interpretation, assessed for accuracy and completeness based on a graded (minor/major/critical) typology of non-correspondence as well as for target-language form and delivery. The corpus-based comparison between the two interpreting modes shows a ‘mixed’ effect of working with the script, with improvements in accuracy for details, such as names, numbers and terms, but a higher risk of critical information loss and a negative impact on fluency. The implications of these findings for interpreter-mediated multilingual communication in the world’s most important forum for international cooperation are discussed.

The Journal of Specialised Translation(44)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quality in simultaneous interpreting with text: A corpus-based case study — Franz Pöchhacker, Lin Zhao · The Journal of Specialised Translation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS