BRIDGING SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION AND OBJECTIVE STRUCTURE IN DESIGN EDUCATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING STUDENTS

Teaching industrial design principles to engineering students at a technical university poses distinct challenges. Unlike art or design students, engineering students often approach problems with a binary perspective, expecting answers to be either correct or incorrect. This mindset complicates their engagement with design, where subjective interpretation and open-ended solutions are fundamental. This abstract presents work carried ut at a university of technology within the Industrial Design Engineering program. The aim has been to clarify the design process for industrial design engineering students by introducing structured methods for articulating subjective decisions. The goal has been twofold: to provide students with tools to self-reflect on their design choices and to establish a shared framework that enhances transparency and communication between students and educators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2025.28
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BRIDGING SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION AND OBJECTIVE STRUCTURE IN DESIGN EDUCATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING STUDENTS

Johan Magnus Heinerud
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

BRIDGING SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION AND OBJECTIVE STRUCTURE IN DESIGN EDUCATION FOR INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING STUDENTS

Johan Magnus Heinerud
article en

Abstract

Teaching industrial design principles to engineering students at a technical university poses distinct challenges. Unlike art or design students, engineering students often approach problems with a binary perspective, expecting answers to be either correct or incorrect. This mindset complicates their engagement with design, where subjective interpretation and open-ended solutions are fundamental. This abstract presents work carried ut at a university of technology within the Industrial Design Engineering program. The aim has been to clarify the design process for industrial design engineering students by introducing structured methods for articulating subjective decisions. The goal has been twofold: to provide students with tools to self-reflect on their design choices and to establish a shared framework that enhances transparency and communication between students and educators.

Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.