A cross-validation study of Turkish sentiment analysis datasets and tools

In recent years, sentiment analysis has gained increasing significance, prompting researchers to explore datasets in various languages, including Turkish. However, the limited availability and reuse of Turkish datasets across studies has yielded highly diverse outcomes. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of sentiment analysis studies on Turkish text. Our search identified 78 relevant studies, from which we extracted over 80 datasets. These studies were labeled using a comprehensive sentiment analysis taxonomy, and the dataset details were compiled into a structured repository. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of four state-of-the-art models-XLM-T, BERTurk (fine-tuned with the BounTi dataset), TSAM, and TurkishBERTweet-on four widely-used Turkish datasets. Among the models, XLM-T achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.92 and F1 score of 0.95 on the Twt dataset, while TSAM reached 0.97 accuracy and F1 score on the Humir dataset. Our empirical results demonstrate that model performance varies significantly based on dataset characteristics such as domain, balance, and linguistic structure. Our review revealed key research gaps, including the limited application of emotion-based and concept-based sentiment analysis techniques and the lack of domain diversity in Turkish sentiment datasets. By highlighting such gaps and compiling a centralized repository, this study provides a comprehensive and publicly accessible resource to guide future research in Turkish sentiment analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Resources and Evaluation
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-025-09869-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A cross-validation study of Turkish sentiment analysis datasets and tools

Ali Hürriyetoğlu, Şevval Çakıcı, Dilara Karaduman, Mehmet Akif Çırlan
3 citations
Language Resources and Evaluation
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
7.44
article

A cross-validation study of Turkish sentiment analysis datasets and tools

Ali Hürriyetoğlu, Şevval Çakıcı, Dilara Karaduman, Mehmet Akif Çırlan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In recent years, sentiment analysis has gained increasing significance, prompting researchers to explore datasets in various languages, including Turkish. However, the limited availability and reuse of Turkish datasets across studies has yielded highly diverse outcomes. To address this, we conducted a systematic review of sentiment analysis studies on Turkish text. Our search identified 78 relevant studies, from which we extracted over 80 datasets. These studies were labeled using a comprehensive sentiment analysis taxonomy, and the dataset details were compiled into a structured repository. Furthermore, we evaluated the performance of four state-of-the-art models-XLM-T, BERTurk (fine-tuned with the BounTi dataset), TSAM, and TurkishBERTweet-on four widely-used Turkish datasets. Among the models, XLM-T achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 0.92 and F1 score of 0.95 on the Twt dataset, while TSAM reached 0.97 accuracy and F1 score on the Humir dataset. Our empirical results demonstrate that model performance varies significantly based on dataset characteristics such as domain, balance, and linguistic structure. Our review revealed key research gaps, including the limited application of emotion-based and concept-based sentiment analysis techniques and the lack of domain diversity in Turkish sentiment datasets. By highlighting such gaps and compiling a centralized repository, this study provides a comprehensive and publicly accessible resource to guide future research in Turkish sentiment analysis.

Language Resources and EvaluationVol. 59(4)
Koç University (TR), Özyeğin University (TR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.