Sensitivity of Human Thermal Comfort Benchmarks to Background Temperature and Individual Factors: An Empirical Study in Wuhan, China

Individuals often adopt distinct behavioral patterns to adapt to different weather conditions. However, most studies on outdoor thermal comfort fail to consider weather variability and associated individual factors as interventions. This study conducted 12 days of field measurements and surveys across two residential areas in Wuhan, categorizing the sampled data based on background temperatures. Thermal benchmarks were developed for different age and gender groups under varying weather conditions, with comparative analyses conducted to evaluate differences in thermal comfort responses. With changes in outdoor temperature, the most comfortable thermal sensation in winter showed a wider fluctuation, ranging from 0.13 to 1.58, while in summer, it ranged between −1.76 and −1.18. The relationship between thermal sensation and comfort varied more significantly among different age groups in winter, while in summer, the differences were more evident between genders. As summer temperatures rose, younger and middle-aged individuals showed a greater increase in thermal sensitivity compared to the elderly. Similarly, males exhibited higher sensitivity than females. In terms of thermally acceptable temperatures, the upper limit was similar across age groups, around 35 °C. However, the lower limit varied as follows: the elderly had the lowest acceptable lower limit of around 0–3 °C; middle-aged individuals tolerated 4–7 °C higher; and young people tolerated 10–12 °C higher than the elderly. Between genders, the upper limit was also similar, but females tolerated 7–10 °C lower temperatures than males. In the context of outdoor thermal comfort studies in residential areas of Wuhan, the Universal Thermal Climate Index demonstrated better applicability than the Physiologically Equivalent Temperature. Overall, by analyzing thermal benchmark models for different demographic groups under varying weather conditions, this study enhances the understanding of how outdoor environments influence thermal comfort and provides valuable insights for targeted microclimate regulation and urban design strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173037
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity of Human Thermal Comfort Benchmarks to Background Temperature and Individual Factors: An Empirical Study in Wuhan, China

Xu Shen, H Wang, Bao‐Jie He, Chi Zhang et al.
2 citations
Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
article

Sensitivity of Human Thermal Comfort Benchmarks to Background Temperature and Individual Factors: An Empirical Study in Wuhan, China

Xu Shen, H Wang, Bao‐Jie He, Chi Zhang, Minghao Wang, Qiwei Chen, Siyao Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Individuals often adopt distinct behavioral patterns to adapt to different weather conditions. However, most studies on outdoor thermal comfort fail to consider weather variability and associated individual factors as interventions. This study conducted 12 days of field measurements and surveys across two residential areas in Wuhan, categorizing the sampled data based on background temperatures. Thermal benchmarks were developed for different age and gender groups under varying weather conditions, with comparative analyses conducted to evaluate differences in thermal comfort responses. With changes in outdoor temperature, the most comfortable thermal sensation in winter showed a wider fluctuation, ranging from 0.13 to 1.58, while in summer, it ranged between −1.76 and −1.18. The relationship between thermal sensation and comfort varied more significantly among different age groups in winter, while in summer, the differences were more evident between genders. As summer temperatures rose, younger and middle-aged individuals showed a greater increase in thermal sensitivity compared to the elderly. Similarly, males exhibited higher sensitivity than females. In terms of thermally acceptable temperatures, the upper limit was similar across age groups, around 35 °C. However, the lower limit varied as follows: the elderly had the lowest acceptable lower limit of around 0–3 °C; middle-aged individuals tolerated 4–7 °C higher; and young people tolerated 10–12 °C higher than the elderly. Between genders, the upper limit was also similar, but females tolerated 7–10 °C lower temperatures than males. In the context of outdoor thermal comfort studies in residential areas of Wuhan, the Universal Thermal Climate Index demonstrated better applicability than the Physiologically Equivalent Temperature. Overall, by analyzing thermal benchmark models for different demographic groups under varying weather conditions, this study enhances the understanding of how outdoor environments influence thermal comfort and provides valuable insights for targeted microclimate regulation and urban design strategies.

BuildingsVol. 15(17)
Chongqing University (CN), The University of Queensland (AU), China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN), Wuhan Engineering Science & Technology Institute (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.