Sentiment Analysis of Teaching Evaluations: Evidence From Nearly 8 Million Rate My Professor Reviews

ABSTRACT Student‐driven teaching evaluations are commonly used in faculty assessments but are known to exhibit gender and racial biases. Despite this, some argue that student comments provide meaningful feedback. Using over 8 million reviews from RateMyProfessors.com , we apply sentiment analysis to evaluate bias in student comments. We find that while comments exhibit similar biases as numerical scores, the effects are more muted. On average, numerical ratings are 2% lower for female instructors and 6% lower for minority instructors. Sentiment scores are 2% lower for female instructors and 3.6%–8.6% lower for minority instructors. These penalties increase with course difficulty but do not vary by institution type. In economics departments, numerical ratings are lower for female and minority instructors; these differences remain statistically significant when sentiment scores are considered. Importantly, nearly 30% of the variation in evaluation scores can be explained by student sentiment, highlighting the influence of subjective language.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Southern Economic Journal
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12787
Primary Topic
Innovations in Educational Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sentiment Analysis of Teaching Evaluations: Evidence From Nearly 8 Million Rate My Professor Reviews

Erin A. Yetter, José M. Fernández
Southern Economic Journal
Innovations in Educational Methods
article

Sentiment Analysis of Teaching Evaluations: Evidence From Nearly 8 Million Rate My Professor Reviews

Erin A. Yetter, José M. Fernández
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Student‐driven teaching evaluations are commonly used in faculty assessments but are known to exhibit gender and racial biases. Despite this, some argue that student comments provide meaningful feedback. Using over 8 million reviews from RateMyProfessors.com , we apply sentiment analysis to evaluate bias in student comments. We find that while comments exhibit similar biases as numerical scores, the effects are more muted. On average, numerical ratings are 2% lower for female instructors and 6% lower for minority instructors. Sentiment scores are 2% lower for female instructors and 3.6%–8.6% lower for minority instructors. These penalties increase with course difficulty but do not vary by institution type. In economics departments, numerical ratings are lower for female and minority instructors; these differences remain statistically significant when sentiment scores are considered. Importantly, nearly 30% of the variation in evaluation scores can be explained by student sentiment, highlighting the influence of subjective language.

Southern Economic JournalVol. 92(2)
University of Louisville (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Innovations in Educational Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.