Choosing the Right Tool for You

Natural Language Processing (NLP) research showcases many promising tools and methods for text analysis. Scholars from diverse fields who want to use NLP for their research are confronted with a wide availability of ready-to-use models that claim excellent performance on standard benchmarks. Consequently, choosing an appropriate tool has become a task on its own. Our goal is to exemplify a methodology that stimulates critical evaluation and detailed analysis of automatic outputs of NLP tools. Particularly, we analyze the case of choosing the best Named Entity Recognition (NER) tool for a corpus of Dutch biographies. Our use case is an example of how to make informed decisions by considering different aspects of custom datasets at the instance and aggregated levels, improving the outcomes of the original research question.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Linköping electronic conference proceedings
Published
2025-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp216.10
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choosing the Right Tool for You

Antske Fokkens, Angel Daza
Linköping electronic conference proceedings
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Choosing the Right Tool for You

Antske Fokkens, Angel Daza
article en

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) research showcases many promising tools and methods for text analysis. Scholars from diverse fields who want to use NLP for their research are confronted with a wide availability of ready-to-use models that claim excellent performance on standard benchmarks. Consequently, choosing an appropriate tool has become a task on its own. Our goal is to exemplify a methodology that stimulates critical evaluation and detailed analysis of automatic outputs of NLP tools. Particularly, we analyze the case of choosing the best Named Entity Recognition (NER) tool for a corpus of Dutch biographies. Our use case is an example of how to make informed decisions by considering different aspects of custom datasets at the instance and aggregated levels, improving the outcomes of the original research question.

Linköping electronic conference proceedingsVol. 216
Netherlands eScience Center (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Choosing the Right Tool for You — Antske Fokkens, Angel Daza · Linköping electronic conference proceedings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS