Eravacycline use in immunocompromised patients: multicenter evaluation of timely versus late initiation on clinical outcomes

Infections from multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria lead to worse outcomes in immunocompromised patients. Eravacycline (ERV) is effective against MDR gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, but its effects in immunocompromised populations remain unstudied. We aimed to evaluate clinical end points of immunocompromised patients receiving timely versus late ERV therapy. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study (October 2018 to September 2022) included adult immunocompromised patients hospitalized and treated with ERV for ≥72 h. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause 30-day mortality, failure to improve clinically while on ERV, and/or microbial recurrence within 30 days of ERV initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier analyzes were used. Eighty-two patients from 17 US centers were included (median age 62 years; 59% male; intensive care unit admissions 57%). In the unadjusted cohort, timely ERV significantly reduced odds of clinical treatment failure (odds ratio [OR]: 0.321, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.129-0.800, <i>P</i> = 0.012) and microbial recurrence (OR: 0.545, 95% CI: 0.326-0.913, <i>P</i> = 0.034) compared to late ERV; in the IPTW-adjusted cohort, these associations remained significant with ORs of 0.675 (95% CI: 0.465-0.979, <i>P</i> = 0.029) for treatment failure and 0.384 (95% CI: 0.142-0.943, <i>P</i> = 0.041) for recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher cumulative proportion of clinical treatment failure in the late ERV group (57%) compared to the timely ERV group (30%, <i>P</i> = 0.013), with a significantly longer time to clinical treatment failure in the timely ERV group (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.034). Timely initiation of ERV in immunocompromised patients may improve clinical outcomes by reducing treatment failure and microbial recurrence compared to later initiation.IMPORTANCEThis multicenter, retrospective study evaluates the impact of timely versus late initiation of eravacycline (ERV) in immunocompromised patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. Immunocompromised patients face heightened risks of severe infections due to weakened immune defenses and limited treatment options, yet data on ERV use in this population are scarce. Our findings demonstrate that timely ERV initiation ≤72 h from index culture collection) significantly reduces clinical treatment failure and microbial recurrence compared to late initiation, with inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted odds ratios of 0.675 (<i>P</i> = 0.029) for treatment failure and 0.384 (<i>P</i> = 0.041) for recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis further confirms that delayed ERV therapy is associated with a higher cumulative incidence of clinical failure (57% vs 30%, <i>P</i> = 0.013). These results highlight the importance of early ERV initiation in optimizing outcomes for immunocompromised patients and addressing the growing challenge of MDR infections, emphasizing the need for further prospective studies to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00565-25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eravacycline use in immunocompromised patients: multicenter evaluation of timely versus late initiation on clinical outcomes

Paige Witucki, S. Lena Kang‐Birken, Melanie Rae Schrack, Taylor Morrisette et al.
1 citations
Microbiology Spectrum
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
1.05
article

Eravacycline use in immunocompromised patients: multicenter evaluation of timely versus late initiation on clinical outcomes

Paige Witucki, S. Lena Kang‐Birken, Melanie Rae Schrack, Taylor Morrisette, Madeline King, Mark Biagi, Michael P. Veve, Amy K. Feehan, Shelbye Herbin, Bruce M Jones, Athena L V Hobbs, Sara Alosaimy, Kristen Lucas, Leonor M. Rojas, Serina Tart, James Truong, Alaina DeKerlegand, Jeannette Bouchard, Ashlan J. Kunz Coyne, Jazmin Agee, Reese Cosimi, Kimberly C. Claeys, Benjamin Pullinger, Tristan Gore, Michael Joseph Rybak, Nicholson B. Perkins, Kyle C. Molina, Justin Andrade, Jing Zhao, Michael Pierce
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Infections from multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria lead to worse outcomes in immunocompromised patients. Eravacycline (ERV) is effective against MDR gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, but its effects in immunocompromised populations remain unstudied. We aimed to evaluate clinical end points of immunocompromised patients receiving timely versus late ERV therapy. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study (October 2018 to September 2022) included adult immunocompromised patients hospitalized and treated with ERV for ≥72 h. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause 30-day mortality, failure to improve clinically while on ERV, and/or microbial recurrence within 30 days of ERV initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier analyzes were used. Eighty-two patients from 17 US centers were included (median age 62 years; 59% male; intensive care unit admissions 57%). In the unadjusted cohort, timely ERV significantly reduced odds of clinical treatment failure (odds ratio [OR]: 0.321, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.129-0.800, <i>P</i> = 0.012) and microbial recurrence (OR: 0.545, 95% CI: 0.326-0.913, <i>P</i> = 0.034) compared to late ERV; in the IPTW-adjusted cohort, these associations remained significant with ORs of 0.675 (95% CI: 0.465-0.979, <i>P</i> = 0.029) for treatment failure and 0.384 (95% CI: 0.142-0.943, <i>P</i> = 0.041) for recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher cumulative proportion of clinical treatment failure in the late ERV group (57%) compared to the timely ERV group (30%, <i>P</i> = 0.013), with a significantly longer time to clinical treatment failure in the timely ERV group (log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.034). Timely initiation of ERV in immunocompromised patients may improve clinical outcomes by reducing treatment failure and microbial recurrence compared to later initiation.IMPORTANCEThis multicenter, retrospective study evaluates the impact of timely versus late initiation of eravacycline (ERV) in immunocompromised patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections. Immunocompromised patients face heightened risks of severe infections due to weakened immune defenses and limited treatment options, yet data on ERV use in this population are scarce. Our findings demonstrate that timely ERV initiation ≤72 h from index culture collection) significantly reduces clinical treatment failure and microbial recurrence compared to late initiation, with inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted odds ratios of 0.675 (<i>P</i> = 0.029) for treatment failure and 0.384 (<i>P</i> = 0.041) for recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis further confirms that delayed ERV therapy is associated with a higher cumulative incidence of clinical failure (57% vs 30%, <i>P</i> = 0.013). These results highlight the importance of early ERV initiation in optimizing outcomes for immunocompromised patients and addressing the growing challenge of MDR infections, emphasizing the need for further prospective studies to confirm these findings.

Microbiology SpectrumVol. 13(10)
Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center (US), Brooklyn Hospital Center (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), The University of Queensland (AU), Wayne State University (US), University of New Orleans (US), Touro College (US), Swedish American Hospital (US), Ochsner Medical Center (US), Detroit Medical Center (US), Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital (US), Cooper University Hospital (US), Valley Hospital Medical Center (US), New York Hospital Queens (US), Harper University Hospital (US), University of Tennessee Medical Center (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), St. Vincent Hospital (US), University of Illinois Chicago, Rockford campus (US), Cape Fear Valley Health System (US), St. Joseph’s Candler Hospital (US), St. Joseph Health System (US), Methodist University Hospital (US), Saint Joseph's University (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.