Rewetting drained boreal peatland forests does not mitigate climate warming in the twenty-first century

Rewetting drained peatland forests restores pristine ecosystem functions, improves peatland ecological status, and has been considered to mitigate climate change. We quantified climate impact of rewetting boreal peatland forests in Northern Europe by comparing the radiative forcing of alternative restoration pathways to that of continued forestry use. We considered changes in soil carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide balance, tree stand carbon sink-source dynamics, albedo change, and included the wood product carbon storage and release. We show that restoring nutrient-rich drained boreal peatland forests contributes to climate warming in the short and medium term (< 200 yr), except in specific cases when tree stand carbon storage is preserved. Rewetting nutrient-poor peatland forests has a persistent warming impact. Our results indicate the ecological benefits of rewetting drained boreal peatland forests come at a climate cost, and that restoration is unlikely to mitigate climate change within a timeframe relevant to the EU climate goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02225-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rewetting drained boreal peatland forests does not mitigate climate warming in the twenty-first century

Janne Rinne, Anssi Ahtikoski, Samuli Launiainen, Paavo Ojanen et al.
2 citations
AMBIO
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
3.43
article

Rewetting drained boreal peatland forests does not mitigate climate warming in the twenty-first century

Janne Rinne, Anssi Ahtikoski, Samuli Launiainen, Paavo Ojanen, Hannu Hökkä
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rewetting drained peatland forests restores pristine ecosystem functions, improves peatland ecological status, and has been considered to mitigate climate change. We quantified climate impact of rewetting boreal peatland forests in Northern Europe by comparing the radiative forcing of alternative restoration pathways to that of continued forestry use. We considered changes in soil carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide balance, tree stand carbon sink-source dynamics, albedo change, and included the wood product carbon storage and release. We show that restoring nutrient-rich drained boreal peatland forests contributes to climate warming in the short and medium term (< 200 yr), except in specific cases when tree stand carbon storage is preserved. Rewetting nutrient-poor peatland forests has a persistent warming impact. Our results indicate the ecological benefits of rewetting drained boreal peatland forests come at a climate cost, and that restoration is unlikely to mitigate climate change within a timeframe relevant to the EU climate goals.

AMBIOVol. 54(12)
University of Helsinki (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Excellent Science, HORIZON EUROPE Excellent Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rewetting drained boreal peatland forests does not mitigate climate warming in the twenty-first century — Janne Rinne, Anssi Ahtikoski, et al. · AMBIO (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS