Examining cognitive processing in simultaneous interpreting with text: What happens when speaker deviates from text?

Abstract In simultaneous interpreting with text (SIMTXT), speaker's deviations from their prepared script often bring challenges to interpreters' cognitive processing. However, empirical research on this input variable and how interpreters cope with it are limited. It is also unclear whether more extensive script pre-reading would mitigate the impact of such deviations. This study explores two essential factors concerning the working conditions of SIMTXT: auditory-script incongruence (congruent vs. incongruent) and durations of preparatory script reading (long-time vs. short-time). Twenty postgraduate interpreting trainees participated in the experiment of English-to-Chinese SIMTXT comprising two stages: preparatory script reading and actual interpreting. Utilizing eye-tracking, we gauged participants' cognitive effort in script processing and visual attention distribution during SIMTXT. Our findings reveal the following: (1) Lexical attributes of the source text (word frequency, lexical density) exerted more pronounced influences on script processing effort than incongruence or preparatory script reading duration. (2) Speech-script incongruence significantly influenced visual attention allocation, manifesting as increased proportions of dwell time and fixation count on the video rather than the script. Furthermore, occurrences of numbers and proper names also influenced attentional processing. (3) Longer preparatory script reading amplified the (in)congruence effect on attention allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Across Languages and Cultures
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2024.00647
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining cognitive processing in simultaneous interpreting with text: What happens when speaker deviates from text?

Binhua Wang, Xingcheng Ma
Across Languages and Cultures
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

Examining cognitive processing in simultaneous interpreting with text: What happens when speaker deviates from text?

Binhua Wang, Xingcheng Ma
article en

Abstract

Abstract In simultaneous interpreting with text (SIMTXT), speaker's deviations from their prepared script often bring challenges to interpreters' cognitive processing. However, empirical research on this input variable and how interpreters cope with it are limited. It is also unclear whether more extensive script pre-reading would mitigate the impact of such deviations. This study explores two essential factors concerning the working conditions of SIMTXT: auditory-script incongruence (congruent vs. incongruent) and durations of preparatory script reading (long-time vs. short-time). Twenty postgraduate interpreting trainees participated in the experiment of English-to-Chinese SIMTXT comprising two stages: preparatory script reading and actual interpreting. Utilizing eye-tracking, we gauged participants' cognitive effort in script processing and visual attention distribution during SIMTXT. Our findings reveal the following: (1) Lexical attributes of the source text (word frequency, lexical density) exerted more pronounced influences on script processing effort than incongruence or preparatory script reading duration. (2) Speech-script incongruence significantly influenced visual attention allocation, manifesting as increased proportions of dwell time and fixation count on the video rather than the script. Furthermore, occurrences of numbers and proper names also influenced attentional processing. (3) Longer preparatory script reading amplified the (in)congruence effect on attention allocation.

Across Languages and CulturesVol. 26(2)
University of Leeds (GB), Southeast University (CN)
Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Examining cognitive processing in simultaneous interpreting with text: What happens when speaker deviates from text? — Binhua Wang, Xingcheng Ma · Across Languages and Cultures (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS