Forest carbon program enrollment in Pennsylvania falls below survey predictions

Abstract Several US programs provide smaller-scale forest landowners access to carbon markets where they can earn payments in exchange for stricter timber management. We study participation in one program—the Family Forest Carbon Program—and find that 1% of likely eligible owners in five high-enrollment counties in Pennsylvania enrolled in the first 3 years, less than what landowner surveys predict. Comparisons of enrolled parcels with those of the likely eligible population reveal a similar average extent of harvesting over the 35 years prior to enrollment. Under the current owner, however, enrolled parcels had 50% more harvesting than comparable parcels. We find that more harvesting in the past 20 years reduces harvesting in the present, suggesting that, absent the Program, enrolled parcels might have less future harvests. The findings indicate that expanding carbon market access is one challenge, enrolling landowners, especially those with high offset potential, is another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02657-8
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forest carbon program enrollment in Pennsylvania falls below survey predictions

Jeremy G. Weber, Natalia Mushegian, Y. F. Wang, Raphael Calel et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Forest Management and Policy
article

Forest carbon program enrollment in Pennsylvania falls below survey predictions

Jeremy G. Weber, Natalia Mushegian, Y. F. Wang, Raphael Calel, Adam Usmanov
article en

Abstract

Abstract Several US programs provide smaller-scale forest landowners access to carbon markets where they can earn payments in exchange for stricter timber management. We study participation in one program—the Family Forest Carbon Program—and find that 1% of likely eligible owners in five high-enrollment counties in Pennsylvania enrolled in the first 3 years, less than what landowner surveys predict. Comparisons of enrolled parcels with those of the likely eligible population reveal a similar average extent of harvesting over the 35 years prior to enrollment. Under the current owner, however, enrolled parcels had 50% more harvesting than comparable parcels. We find that more harvesting in the past 20 years reduces harvesting in the present, suggesting that, absent the Program, enrolled parcels might have less future harvests. The findings indicate that expanding carbon market access is one challenge, enrolling landowners, especially those with high offset potential, is another.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 6(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), The University of Sydney (AU), University of Pittsburgh (US), Georgetown University (US)
University of Pittsburgh
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forest carbon program enrollment in Pennsylvania falls below survey predictions — Jeremy G. Weber, Natalia Mushegian, et al. · Communications Earth & Environment (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS