Uncertainty-aware waveform modeling for high signal-to-noise ratio gravitational-wave inference

Semianalytical waveform models for black hole binaries require calibration against numerical relativity waveforms to accurately represent the late inspiral and merger, where analytical approximations fail. After the fitting coefficients contained in the model are optimized, they are typically held fixed when the model is used to infer astrophysical parameters from real gravitational-wave data. Though point estimates for the fitting parameters are adequate for most applications, they provide an incomplete description of the fit, as they do not account for either the quality of the fit or the intrinsic uncertainties in the numerical relativity data. Using the imrphenomd model, we illustrate how to propagate these uncertainties into the inference by sampling the fitting coefficients from a prior distribution and marginalizing over them. The prior distribution is constructed by ensuring that the model is compatible with a training set of numerical relativity surrogates, within a predefined mismatch threshold. This approach demonstrates a pathway to mitigate systematic bias in high signal-to-noise events, particularly when envisioned for the next generation of semianalytical models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/hfq5-gryy
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty-aware waveform modeling for high signal-to-noise ratio gravitational-wave inference

Neil J. Cornish, Simone Mezzasoma, Nicolás Yunes, Caroline B. Owen et al.
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
article

Uncertainty-aware waveform modeling for high signal-to-noise ratio gravitational-wave inference

Neil J. Cornish, Simone Mezzasoma, Nicolás Yunes, Caroline B. Owen, C.‐J. Haster
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Semianalytical waveform models for black hole binaries require calibration against numerical relativity waveforms to accurately represent the late inspiral and merger, where analytical approximations fail. After the fitting coefficients contained in the model are optimized, they are typically held fixed when the model is used to infer astrophysical parameters from real gravitational-wave data. Though point estimates for the fitting parameters are adequate for most applications, they provide an incomplete description of the fit, as they do not account for either the quality of the fit or the intrinsic uncertainties in the numerical relativity data. Using the imrphenomd model, we illustrate how to propagate these uncertainties into the inference by sampling the fitting coefficients from a prior distribution and marginalizing over them. The prior distribution is constructed by ensuring that the model is compatible with a training set of numerical relativity surrogates, within a predefined mismatch threshold. This approach demonstrates a pathway to mitigate systematic bias in high signal-to-noise events, particularly when envisioned for the next generation of semianalytical models.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(4)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Montana State University (US), Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Milano Bicocca (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Simons Foundation, International Council of Shopping Centers Educational Foundation, University of Illinois System, Fondazione Cariplo, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, European Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.