Numerical Assessment of Cast-in-Place Anchor Pullout Strength Regarding CCD Methodology

Reliable anchorage of cast-in-place headed bolts in unreinforced concrete is vital in structural and industrial applications, where inaccurate strength predictions can compromise safety and efficiency. This study develops and validates an elastic–plastic concrete model within LS-DYNA to assess the tensile performance of headed anchors with varying embedment depth-to-diameter ratios. A parametric analysis is conducted, considering different concrete strengths, anchor sizes, and steel yield strengths. The results show notable deviations from the Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) method, particularly under high-strength concrete and reduced embedment ratios. The CCD method underestimates capacity at 30–40 MPa and overestimates it at 20 MPa. A correction coefficient is proposed to improve embedment depth estimation. The findings offer practical guidance for safer and more accurate anchor design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173040
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Assessment of Cast-in-Place Anchor Pullout Strength Regarding CCD Methodology

Javad Mokari Rahmdel, Tadeh Zirakian, Erfan Shafei, S. Tariverdilo et al.
4 links
Buildings
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Numerical Assessment of Cast-in-Place Anchor Pullout Strength Regarding CCD Methodology

Javad Mokari Rahmdel, Tadeh Zirakian, Erfan Shafei, S. Tariverdilo, Mohammad Mam-Ahmadi
article en

Abstract

Reliable anchorage of cast-in-place headed bolts in unreinforced concrete is vital in structural and industrial applications, where inaccurate strength predictions can compromise safety and efficiency. This study develops and validates an elastic–plastic concrete model within LS-DYNA to assess the tensile performance of headed anchors with varying embedment depth-to-diameter ratios. A parametric analysis is conducted, considering different concrete strengths, anchor sizes, and steel yield strengths. The results show notable deviations from the Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) method, particularly under high-strength concrete and reduced embedment ratios. The CCD method underestimates capacity at 30–40 MPa and overestimates it at 20 MPa. A correction coefficient is proposed to improve embedment depth estimation. The findings offer practical guidance for safer and more accurate anchor design.

BuildingsVol. 15(17)
Urmia University of Technology (IR), California State University, Northridge (US), Urmia University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Numerical Assessment of Cast-in-Place Anchor Pullout Strength Regarding CCD Methodology — Javad Mokari Rahmdel, Tadeh Zirakian, et al. · Buildings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS