Microsurgical Bypass for Complex Intracranial Aneurysms in the Endovascular Era: Insights from a High-Volume Referral Center

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Endovascular treatment has become the primary treatment for intracranial aneurysms, yet direct bypass surgery remains an option in selected cases where standard approaches fail. This study aims to evaluate the role, indications, and outcomes of bypass surgery for intracranial aneurysm management in the current endovascular era. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive cases who underwent direct intracranial bypass surgery for intracranial aneurysms between 2015 and 2024. Data on demographics, aneurysm characteristics, indications, bypass type, patency, and clinical outcomes (using the modified Rankin Scale) were collected. <b>Results</b>: Of the 101 bypasses performed between 2015 and 2025, 25 were used for complex aneurysm cases. Intracranial bypass was necessary in as many as 5% of all microsurgical aneurysm repairs in 2023 and 10% in 2024. Bypass surgery was indicated in young patients with complex aneurysms not amenable to endovascular therapy (45%) and in 20% of the cases for recanalized aneurysms after previous endovascular repair. Intraoperative and postoperative bypass patency was confirmed for all patients except one case due to ongoing malignant brain swelling after an ongoing infarction. At follow-up, 87% of patients, with both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, had a good outcome (mRS ≤ 2), and all patients had a patent bypass. Permanent morbidity was observed in 5% and procedure-related mortality in 0%. <b>Conclusions</b>: While bypass surgery constitutes a minority of intracranial aneurysm treatment by volume, its role in intracranial aneurysm repair is crucial and relevant in response to the evolving complexity of aneurysms. Further refinement of techniques is necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microsurgical Bypass for Complex Intracranial Aneurysms in the Endovascular Era: Insights from a High-Volume Referral Center

Yasmin Sadigh, Rúben Dammers, Victor Volovici, Eva Joëlle Haasdijk
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
1.39
article

Microsurgical Bypass for Complex Intracranial Aneurysms in the Endovascular Era: Insights from a High-Volume Referral Center

Yasmin Sadigh, Rúben Dammers, Victor Volovici, Eva Joëlle Haasdijk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Endovascular treatment has become the primary treatment for intracranial aneurysms, yet direct bypass surgery remains an option in selected cases where standard approaches fail. This study aims to evaluate the role, indications, and outcomes of bypass surgery for intracranial aneurysm management in the current endovascular era. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive cases who underwent direct intracranial bypass surgery for intracranial aneurysms between 2015 and 2024. Data on demographics, aneurysm characteristics, indications, bypass type, patency, and clinical outcomes (using the modified Rankin Scale) were collected. <b>Results</b>: Of the 101 bypasses performed between 2015 and 2025, 25 were used for complex aneurysm cases. Intracranial bypass was necessary in as many as 5% of all microsurgical aneurysm repairs in 2023 and 10% in 2024. Bypass surgery was indicated in young patients with complex aneurysms not amenable to endovascular therapy (45%) and in 20% of the cases for recanalized aneurysms after previous endovascular repair. Intraoperative and postoperative bypass patency was confirmed for all patients except one case due to ongoing malignant brain swelling after an ongoing infarction. At follow-up, 87% of patients, with both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms, had a good outcome (mRS ≤ 2), and all patients had a patent bypass. Permanent morbidity was observed in 5% and procedure-related mortality in 0%. <b>Conclusions</b>: While bypass surgery constitutes a minority of intracranial aneurysm treatment by volume, its role in intracranial aneurysm repair is crucial and relevant in response to the evolving complexity of aneurysms. Further refinement of techniques is necessary.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(17)
Erasmus MC (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.