“It's also up to me”: Women's navigations of affective dissonance in gendered workplaces

This article investigates how experiences of affective dissonance are reined in by postfeminist and neoliberal logics in women's accounts of navigating gender inequality at work. I present three forms of affective-discursive practice —namely (a) reactive self-doubt, (b) navigating the double-bind, and (c) voicing critique—and contend that they form part of normative work-based femininities. By providing a nuanced understanding of the affective-discursive processes that make organizational gender inequality feel “ natural” and “normal” for women, the analyses presented here contribute to explaining the persistence of the gendered workplace. I argue that women's practicing of postfeminist affects is embedded within a gendered relational logic which ultimately deprives them of their voice and thus leaves male privilege unchallenged. While there is no “easy way out,” the act of questioning why women feel the way they do (about work) constitutes an important step towards making organizational gender inequality feel outrageous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Feminism & Psychology
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09593535251367108
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It's also up to me”: Women's navigations of affective dissonance in gendered workplaces

Nilima Chowdhury
Feminism & Psychology
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

“It's also up to me”: Women's navigations of affective dissonance in gendered workplaces

Nilima Chowdhury
article en

Abstract

This article investigates how experiences of affective dissonance are reined in by postfeminist and neoliberal logics in women's accounts of navigating gender inequality at work. I present three forms of affective-discursive practice —namely (a) reactive self-doubt, (b) navigating the double-bind, and (c) voicing critique—and contend that they form part of normative work-based femininities. By providing a nuanced understanding of the affective-discursive processes that make organizational gender inequality feel “ natural” and “normal” for women, the analyses presented here contribute to explaining the persistence of the gendered workplace. I argue that women's practicing of postfeminist affects is embedded within a gendered relational logic which ultimately deprives them of their voice and thus leaves male privilege unchallenged. While there is no “easy way out,” the act of questioning why women feel the way they do (about work) constitutes an important step towards making organizational gender inequality feel outrageous.

Feminism & PsychologyVol. 35(4)
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Universität St. Gallen
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“It's also up to me”: Women's navigations of affective dissonance in gendered workplaces — Nilima Chowdhury · Feminism & Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS