Digital nationalism in China: Expression, propaganda, and soft authoritarianism

This commentary explores the rise of digital nationalism in China, focusing on how the state utilizes a form of soft authoritarianism that blends subtle control with participatory aesthetic nationalist propaganda to shape and manage public discourse. Rather than relying solely on overt repression, the Chinese government leverages emotionally compelling narratives and strategic ambiguity to cultivate nationalist sentiment that appears spontaneous yet remains firmly aligned with state ideology. Nationalism here functions not simply as propaganda, but as a communicative infrastructure embedded within everyday digital practices, designed to generate affective compliance. By selectively permitting expression while carefully curating tone and content, the state creates a controlled participatory space that reinforces its legitimacy. This evolving model of soft authoritarianism challenges traditional binaries of censorship and freedom, presenting a more adaptive and nuanced mode of governance that other authoritarian regimes may increasingly adopt in the digital era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640251371780
Citations
1
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital nationalism in China: Expression, propaganda, and soft authoritarianism

Dechun Zhang
1 citations
Dialogues on Digital Society
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
8.52
article

Digital nationalism in China: Expression, propaganda, and soft authoritarianism

Dechun Zhang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This commentary explores the rise of digital nationalism in China, focusing on how the state utilizes a form of soft authoritarianism that blends subtle control with participatory aesthetic nationalist propaganda to shape and manage public discourse. Rather than relying solely on overt repression, the Chinese government leverages emotionally compelling narratives and strategic ambiguity to cultivate nationalist sentiment that appears spontaneous yet remains firmly aligned with state ideology. Nationalism here functions not simply as propaganda, but as a communicative infrastructure embedded within everyday digital practices, designed to generate affective compliance. By selectively permitting expression while carefully curating tone and content, the state creates a controlled participatory space that reinforces its legitimacy. This evolving model of soft authoritarianism challenges traditional binaries of censorship and freedom, presenting a more adaptive and nuanced mode of governance that other authoritarian regimes may increasingly adopt in the digital era.

Dialogues on Digital SocietyVol. 1(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital nationalism in China: Expression, propaganda, and soft authoritarianism — Dechun Zhang · Dialogues on Digital Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS