Hypergraph burning, matchings, and zero forcing

Lazy burning is a recently introduced variation of burning where only one set of vertices is chosen to burn during the first round. In hypergraphs, lazy burning spreads when all but one vertex in a hyperedge is burned. The lazy burning number is the minimum number of initially burned vertices that eventually burn all vertices. We give several equivalent characterizations of lazy burning on hypergraphs using matchings and zero forcing, and then apply these to establish new bounds and complexity results. We prove that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph H equals its order minus the maximum cardinality of a certain matching on its incidence graph. Using this characterization, we give a formula for the lazy burning number of a dual hypergraph and give new bounds on the lazy burning number based on various hypergraph parameters. We show that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph may be characterized by a maximal subhypergraph that results from iteratively deleting vertices in singleton hyperedges. We prove that lazy burning on a hypergraph is equivalent to zero forcing on its incidence graph and show an equivalence between skew zero forcing on a graph and lazy burning on its neighborhood hypergraph. As a result, we show that the decision problem of computing the lazy burning number of a hypergraph is NP-complete, which solves an open problem in [12] . By applying the results found for lazy burning, we show that the decision problem of computing the skew zero forcing number for bipartite graphs is NP-complete. We finish with open problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical Computer Science
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2025.115529
Primary Topic
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypergraph burning, matchings, and zero forcing

Zhiyuan Zhang, Trent G. Marbach, Teddy Mishura, Anthony Bonato et al.
Theoretical Computer Science
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
article

Hypergraph burning, matchings, and zero forcing

Zhiyuan Zhang, Trent G. Marbach, Teddy Mishura, Anthony Bonato, Caleb Jones
article en

Abstract

Lazy burning is a recently introduced variation of burning where only one set of vertices is chosen to burn during the first round. In hypergraphs, lazy burning spreads when all but one vertex in a hyperedge is burned. The lazy burning number is the minimum number of initially burned vertices that eventually burn all vertices. We give several equivalent characterizations of lazy burning on hypergraphs using matchings and zero forcing, and then apply these to establish new bounds and complexity results. We prove that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph H equals its order minus the maximum cardinality of a certain matching on its incidence graph. Using this characterization, we give a formula for the lazy burning number of a dual hypergraph and give new bounds on the lazy burning number based on various hypergraph parameters. We show that the lazy burning number of a hypergraph may be characterized by a maximal subhypergraph that results from iteratively deleting vertices in singleton hyperedges. We prove that lazy burning on a hypergraph is equivalent to zero forcing on its incidence graph and show an equivalence between skew zero forcing on a graph and lazy burning on its neighborhood hypergraph. As a result, we show that the decision problem of computing the lazy burning number of a hypergraph is NP-complete, which solves an open problem in [12] . By applying the results found for lazy burning, we show that the decision problem of computing the skew zero forcing number for bipartite graphs is NP-complete. We finish with open problems.

Theoretical Computer ScienceVol. 1056
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.