Regime changes and spatial dependence in the 2020 US presidential election polls

This paper introduces a novel two-stage modeling framework that combines Markov Switching (MS) models with an autoregressive model augmented by spatial effects to analyze the dynamics and spatial interdependence of Biden’s polling percentages during the 2020 electoral campaign. In the first stage, we employ MS models to segment each state’s daily polling time series into distinct regimes – interpreted as phases of decline, stability, and growth. This segmentation captures abrupt changes and local trends in public opinion, enabling us to link regime shifts with key political events such as debates, party conventions, and milestone campaign achievements. The inherent nonlinearity of polling data would otherwise be lost by first differencing. By removing the regime-specific components, we generate stationary residuals modeled using an Autoregressive model with exogenous variables (ARX) that incorporates political spatial interactions through two complementary effects. The spillover effect captures lagged influences arising from politically influential states, while the contagion effect reflects the contemporaneous impact of neighboring states. A recursive algorithm based on partial correlations is implemented to select the most relevant spillover sources for each state. Empirical results, based on daily data from 13 swing states, reveal robust evidence of persistent regime structures and marked spatial dependencies. While contagion effects are uniformly significant across states, spillover dynamics exhibit considerable heterogeneity in both magnitude and direction. This integrated modeling approach enhances our understanding of the complex, nonlinear temporal evolution of polling trends and the spatial diffusion of political opinions that underpinned the 2020 electoral outcome. • Analysis of 2020 polls in 13 swing states during the U.S. election. • Two-stage model captures regime shifts and spatial dependencies. • Regimes reflect phases of growth, stability, and decline in support. • Spillover and contagion modeled as distinct spatial effects. • Recursive algorithm selects key influential states for each state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spatial Statistics
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2025.100927
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regime changes and spatial dependence in the 2020 US presidential election polls

Giampiero M. Gallo, Demetrio Lacava, Edoardo Otranto
Spatial Statistics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Regime changes and spatial dependence in the 2020 US presidential election polls

Giampiero M. Gallo, Demetrio Lacava, Edoardo Otranto
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel two-stage modeling framework that combines Markov Switching (MS) models with an autoregressive model augmented by spatial effects to analyze the dynamics and spatial interdependence of Biden’s polling percentages during the 2020 electoral campaign. In the first stage, we employ MS models to segment each state’s daily polling time series into distinct regimes – interpreted as phases of decline, stability, and growth. This segmentation captures abrupt changes and local trends in public opinion, enabling us to link regime shifts with key political events such as debates, party conventions, and milestone campaign achievements. The inherent nonlinearity of polling data would otherwise be lost by first differencing. By removing the regime-specific components, we generate stationary residuals modeled using an Autoregressive model with exogenous variables (ARX) that incorporates political spatial interactions through two complementary effects. The spillover effect captures lagged influences arising from politically influential states, while the contagion effect reflects the contemporaneous impact of neighboring states. A recursive algorithm based on partial correlations is implemented to select the most relevant spillover sources for each state. Empirical results, based on daily data from 13 swing states, reveal robust evidence of persistent regime structures and marked spatial dependencies. While contagion effects are uniformly significant across states, spillover dynamics exhibit considerable heterogeneity in both magnitude and direction. This integrated modeling approach enhances our understanding of the complex, nonlinear temporal evolution of polling trends and the spatial diffusion of political opinions that underpinned the 2020 electoral outcome. • Analysis of 2020 polls in 13 swing states during the U.S. election. • Two-stage model captures regime shifts and spatial dependencies. • Regimes reflect phases of growth, stability, and decline in support. • Spillover and contagion modeled as distinct spatial effects. • Recursive algorithm selects key influential states for each state.

Spatial StatisticsVol. 69
University of Messina (IT), Centro Ricerche FIAT (IT), University of Florence (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.