TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors

Insect odorant receptors (iORs) are seven-transmembrane-domain (7TM) ion channels crucial for insect survival, playing key roles in insect behaviour such as foraging, pollination, social interaction, and prey recognition. Unlike G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), iORs are "inverted" in the membrane and function independently of accessory G proteins. iORs form complexes with a highly conserved co-receptor (Orco), allowing calcium ions to enter the cell upon ligand binding and are promising targets for pest control strategies. However, due to their structural complexity, experimental determination of iOR structures remains a challenge. This scarcity of experimental data underscores the urgent need for reliable computational modeling approaches to understand iOR structure and function. With the rise of the deep learning (DL) approach AlphaFold, currently in its third version, we explored whether detailed template-based modeling (TBM), using the few available experimental insect OR structures, is still required, instead of a quick AI-generated AlphaFold 3 (AF3) model. For six OR sequences from three insect orders, we compared TBM models with standard AF3 models, and AF3 models with lipid molecules, creating an artificial membrane. Our evaluation of functional mutagenesis data supports TBM models for iORs rather than AF3 models, for ligand discovery for insect pest-specific control using structure-based approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2025.08.028
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors

Amara Jabeen, S.E. Zographos, Phillip W. Taylor, Shoba Ranganathan et al.
1 citations
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
0.91
article

TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors

Amara Jabeen, S.E. Zographos, Phillip W. Taylor, Shoba Ranganathan, Vaanathi Chidambara Thanu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Insect odorant receptors (iORs) are seven-transmembrane-domain (7TM) ion channels crucial for insect survival, playing key roles in insect behaviour such as foraging, pollination, social interaction, and prey recognition. Unlike G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), iORs are "inverted" in the membrane and function independently of accessory G proteins. iORs form complexes with a highly conserved co-receptor (Orco), allowing calcium ions to enter the cell upon ligand binding and are promising targets for pest control strategies. However, due to their structural complexity, experimental determination of iOR structures remains a challenge. This scarcity of experimental data underscores the urgent need for reliable computational modeling approaches to understand iOR structure and function. With the rise of the deep learning (DL) approach AlphaFold, currently in its third version, we explored whether detailed template-based modeling (TBM), using the few available experimental insect OR structures, is still required, instead of a quick AI-generated AlphaFold 3 (AF3) model. For six OR sequences from three insect orders, we compared TBM models with standard AF3 models, and AF3 models with lipid molecules, creating an artificial membrane. Our evaluation of functional mutagenesis data supports TBM models for iORs rather than AF3 models, for ligand discovery for insect pest-specific control using structure-based approaches.

Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalVol. 27
National Hellenic Research Foundation (GR), Macquarie University (AU)
National Computational Infrastructure, Macquarie University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, National Cancer Institute
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
0.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.