Revisiting the proper motions of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars with Gaia DR3

The proper motions (PMs) of M31 and M33 are key to understanding the Local Group’s dynamical evolution. However, measurement discrepancies between Gaia blue and red samples, regarding whether the transverse velocity is remarkable, introduce significant ambiguity. In this work, we remeasure the systemic PMs of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars from Gaia Data Release 3. Clean disk tracers are selected via color–color diagrams, with foreground contaminants removed through kinematic and astrometric cuts. We identify the discrepancy in M31’s blue and red samples as arising from systematic differences between Gaia ’s five-parameter (5p) and six-parameter (6p) astrometric solutions. The 6p solution, applied to sources lacking accurate color information, relies on a pseudo-color approximation, leading to lower precision and larger uncertainties. Two key limitations of the 6p solution are: (1) degraded astrometric accuracy for very red sources ( G BP − G RP > 2.6); (2) significant PM zero-point offsets. In our sample, red sources are dominated by the 6p solution, while blue sources include a substantial fraction of 5p sources; this mismatch drives the observed discrepancy. By excluding extreme red sources and calibrating PM zero-points separately for 5p and 6p sources using background quasars, we reduce the discrepancy, bringing blue and red measurements into agreement within 1 σ . We ultimately report the most robust Gaia -based PMs using high-quality 5p sources. For M31, we obtain ( μ α ∗ , μ δ ) M31 = (45.9±8.1, − 20.5±6.6)μas yr −1 , consistent with, but more precise than, the HST result. For M33, we find that ( μ α ∗ , μ δ ) M33 = (45.3±9.7, 26.3±7.3) μ as yr −1 , which agrees with the VLBA measurement within 1.5 σ . These results support a first infall scenario for M33.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202555477
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the proper motions of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars with Gaia DR3

Yang Huang, Huawei Zhang, Qikang Feng, Hao‐Yi Wu
1 citations
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
article

Revisiting the proper motions of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars with Gaia DR3

Yang Huang, Huawei Zhang, Qikang Feng, Hao‐Yi Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The proper motions (PMs) of M31 and M33 are key to understanding the Local Group’s dynamical evolution. However, measurement discrepancies between Gaia blue and red samples, regarding whether the transverse velocity is remarkable, introduce significant ambiguity. In this work, we remeasure the systemic PMs of M31 and M33 using massive supergiant stars from Gaia Data Release 3. Clean disk tracers are selected via color–color diagrams, with foreground contaminants removed through kinematic and astrometric cuts. We identify the discrepancy in M31’s blue and red samples as arising from systematic differences between Gaia ’s five-parameter (5p) and six-parameter (6p) astrometric solutions. The 6p solution, applied to sources lacking accurate color information, relies on a pseudo-color approximation, leading to lower precision and larger uncertainties. Two key limitations of the 6p solution are: (1) degraded astrometric accuracy for very red sources ( G BP − G RP > 2.6); (2) significant PM zero-point offsets. In our sample, red sources are dominated by the 6p solution, while blue sources include a substantial fraction of 5p sources; this mismatch drives the observed discrepancy. By excluding extreme red sources and calibrating PM zero-points separately for 5p and 6p sources using background quasars, we reduce the discrepancy, bringing blue and red measurements into agreement within 1 σ . We ultimately report the most robust Gaia -based PMs using high-quality 5p sources. For M31, we obtain ( μ α ∗ , μ δ ) M31 = (45.9±8.1, − 20.5±6.6)μas yr −1 , consistent with, but more precise than, the HST result. For M33, we find that ( μ α ∗ , μ δ ) M33 = (45.3±9.7, 26.3±7.3) μ as yr −1 , which agrees with the VLBA measurement within 1.5 σ . These results support a first infall scenario for M33.

Astronomy and AstrophysicsVol. 701
King University (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Astronomy and Space (AU), National Astronomical Observatories (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.