eIDPS: A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Packet-Level and Flow-Level Intrusion Detection and Prevention

Modern cybersecurity relies on Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) to detect and mitigate malicious network activity. This study proposes eIDPS, a packet-level IDPS leveraging Machine Learning and the extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) for real-time threat detection within the kernel. Unlike a flow-based approach, which analyzes aggregated network flows, eIDPS operates at the packet level, enabling faster decision-making while it does not drop entire flows when a malicious packet is detected, allowing for more precise threat mitigation. Experimental evaluation using CIC-IDS2017, a benchmark intrusion detection dataset, demonstrates that eIDPS achieves higher precision and F1-score compared to a flow-based solution identified in the literature, while still operating in real time. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between packetlevel and flow-based intrusion detection, offering insights into the deployment of eBPF-based security solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/csr64739.2025.11130045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

eIDPS: A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Packet-Level and Flow-Level Intrusion Detection and Prevention

Dimitra Papatsaroucha, Evangelos Markakis, Ioannis Kefaloukos, Stamatios Kostopoulos
1 citations
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
1.49
article

eIDPS: A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Packet-Level and Flow-Level Intrusion Detection and Prevention

Dimitra Papatsaroucha, Evangelos Markakis, Ioannis Kefaloukos, Stamatios Kostopoulos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Modern cybersecurity relies on Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) to detect and mitigate malicious network activity. This study proposes eIDPS, a packet-level IDPS leveraging Machine Learning and the extended Berkeley Packet Filter (eBPF) for real-time threat detection within the kernel. Unlike a flow-based approach, which analyzes aggregated network flows, eIDPS operates at the packet level, enabling faster decision-making while it does not drop entire flows when a malicious packet is detected, allowing for more precise threat mitigation. Experimental evaluation using CIC-IDS2017, a benchmark intrusion detection dataset, demonstrates that eIDPS achieves higher precision and F1-score compared to a flow-based solution identified in the literature, while still operating in real time. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between packetlevel and flow-based intrusion detection, offering insights into the deployment of eBPF-based security solutions.

Mediterranean University (ME)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

eIDPS: A Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of Packet-Level and Flow-Level Intrusion Detection and Prevention — Dimitra Papatsaroucha, Evangelos Markakis, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS