SoK: Systematization and Benchmarking of Deepfake Detectors in a Unified Framework

Deepfakes have rapidly emerged as a serious threat to society due to their ease of creation and dissemination, triggering the accelerated development of detection technologies. However, many existing detectors rely on lab-generated datasets for validation, which may not prepare them for novel, real-world deepfakes. This paper extensively reviews and analyzes state-of-the-art deepfake detectors, evaluating them against several critical criteria. These criteria categorize detectors into 4 high-level groups and 13 fine-grained sub-groups, aligned with a unified conceptual framework we propose. This classification offers practical insights into the factors affecting detector efficacy. We evaluate the generalizability of 16 leading detectors across comprehensive attack scenarios, including black-box, white-box, and gray-box settings. Our systematized analysis and experiments provide a deeper understanding of deepfake detectors and their generalizability, paving the way for future research and the development of more proactive defenses against deepfakes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eurosp63326.2025.00055
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SoK: Systematization and Benchmarking of Deepfake Detectors in a Unified Framework

Shahroz Tariq, Simon S. Woo, Kristen Moore, Binh M. Le et al.
3 citations
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
7.44
article

SoK: Systematization and Benchmarking of Deepfake Detectors in a Unified Framework

Shahroz Tariq, Simon S. Woo, Kristen Moore, Binh M. Le, Alsharif Abuadbba, Jiwon Kim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Deepfakes have rapidly emerged as a serious threat to society due to their ease of creation and dissemination, triggering the accelerated development of detection technologies. However, many existing detectors rely on lab-generated datasets for validation, which may not prepare them for novel, real-world deepfakes. This paper extensively reviews and analyzes state-of-the-art deepfake detectors, evaluating them against several critical criteria. These criteria categorize detectors into 4 high-level groups and 13 fine-grained sub-groups, aligned with a unified conceptual framework we propose. This classification offers practical insights into the factors affecting detector efficacy. We evaluate the generalizability of 16 leading detectors across comprehensive attack scenarios, including black-box, white-box, and gray-box settings. Our systematized analysis and experiments provide a deeper understanding of deepfake detectors and their generalizability, paving the way for future research and the development of more proactive defenses against deepfakes.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Data61 (AU), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.