Beneath the Surface: An Analysis of OEM Customizations on the Android TLS Protocol Stack

The open-source nature of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) allows Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to customize the Android operating system, contributing to what is known as Android fragmentation. Google has implemented the Compatibility Definition Document (CDD) and the Compatibility Test Suite (CTS) to ensure the integrity and security of the Android ecosystem. However, the effectiveness of these policies and measures in warranting OEM compliance remains uncertain. This paper empirically studies for the first time the nature of OEM customizations in the Android TLS protocol stack, and their security implications on user-installed mobile apps across thousands of Android models. We find that approximately 80% of the analyzed Android models deviate from the standard AOSP TLS codebase and that OEM customizations often involve code changes in functions used by app developers for enhancing TLS security like end-point and certificate verification. Our analysis suggests that these customizations are likely influenced by factors such as manufacturers’ supply chain dynamics and patching prioritization tactics, including the need to support legacy components. We conclude by identifying potential root causes and emphasizing the need for stricter policy enforcement, better supply chain controls, and improved patching processes across the ecosystem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/eurosp63326.2025.00044
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beneath the Surface: An Analysis of OEM Customizations on the Android TLS Protocol Stack

Narseo Vallina-Rodríguez, Stijn Pletinckx, Christopher Kruegel, Vinuri Bandara et al.
1 citations
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
4.99
article

Beneath the Surface: An Analysis of OEM Customizations on the Android TLS Protocol Stack

Narseo Vallina-Rodríguez, Stijn Pletinckx, Christopher Kruegel, Vinuri Bandara, Juan Tapiador, Ilya Grishchenko, Giovanni Vigna
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The open-source nature of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) allows Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to customize the Android operating system, contributing to what is known as Android fragmentation. Google has implemented the Compatibility Definition Document (CDD) and the Compatibility Test Suite (CTS) to ensure the integrity and security of the Android ecosystem. However, the effectiveness of these policies and measures in warranting OEM compliance remains uncertain. This paper empirically studies for the first time the nature of OEM customizations in the Android TLS protocol stack, and their security implications on user-installed mobile apps across thousands of Android models. We find that approximately 80% of the analyzed Android models deviate from the standard AOSP TLS codebase and that OEM customizations often involve code changes in functions used by app developers for enhancing TLS security like end-point and certificate verification. Our analysis suggests that these customizations are likely influenced by factors such as manufacturers’ supply chain dynamics and patching prioritization tactics, including the need to support legacy components. We conclude by identifying potential root causes and emphasizing the need for stricter policy enforcement, better supply chain controls, and improved patching processes across the ecosystem.

University of California, Santa Barbara (US), IMDEA Networks (ES), Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
Comunidad de Madrid
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.