Embracing the void: exploring the relationship between chronic loneliness and social touch

Loneliness is a widespread experience, and its chronic form poses a significant risk for physical and mental health. Touch is a key modality of social interaction and has considerable health benefits across the lifespan. Touch-based interventions may serve as an effective method to alleviate loneliness. However, previous studies have yielded heterogenous results, with outcomes ranging from beneficial to detrimental effects in individuals experiencing loneliness. While methodological differences likely contribute to this inconsistency, a crucial factor, the chronicity of loneliness, has been largely overlooked. This review proposes a model in which the desire for social contact is enhanced during acute stages of loneliness. In contrast, chronic loneliness is associated with increased distrust and perceived social threat, potentially leading to reduced receptivity to touch. We argue that future research should account for the chronicity of loneliness when evaluating the efficacy of touch-based interventions, with experimental studies needed to empirically test this hypothesis. • Social touch effectively improves physical and mental health outcomes. • Evidence that touch alleviates loneliness remains sparse and inconclusive. • Chronicity of loneliness may explain variability in the existing literature. • We propose that touch is beneficial in acute loneliness as social contact is sought. • In chronic stages, negative cognitive biases may lead to unpleasant touch experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-08-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101590
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embracing the void: exploring the relationship between chronic loneliness and social touch

René Hurlemann, Dirk Scheele, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Julian Packheiser
1 citations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
2.44
article

Embracing the void: exploring the relationship between chronic loneliness and social touch

René Hurlemann, Dirk Scheele, Sebastian Ocklenburg, Julian Packheiser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Loneliness is a widespread experience, and its chronic form poses a significant risk for physical and mental health. Touch is a key modality of social interaction and has considerable health benefits across the lifespan. Touch-based interventions may serve as an effective method to alleviate loneliness. However, previous studies have yielded heterogenous results, with outcomes ranging from beneficial to detrimental effects in individuals experiencing loneliness. While methodological differences likely contribute to this inconsistency, a crucial factor, the chronicity of loneliness, has been largely overlooked. This review proposes a model in which the desire for social contact is enhanced during acute stages of loneliness. In contrast, chronic loneliness is associated with increased distrust and perceived social threat, potentially leading to reduced receptivity to touch. We argue that future research should account for the chronicity of loneliness when evaluating the efficacy of touch-based interventions, with experimental studies needed to empirically test this hypothesis. • Social touch effectively improves physical and mental health outcomes. • Evidence that touch alleviates loneliness remains sparse and inconclusive. • Chronicity of loneliness may explain variability in the existing literature. • We propose that touch is beneficial in acute loneliness as social contact is sought. • In chronic stages, negative cognitive biases may lead to unpleasant touch experiences.

Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesVol. 66
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.